Author Topic: Question regarding thread derailment rules.  (Read 4563 times)

0 Members and 11 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline RisiR

  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,710
  • The Anti-Mod
    • View Profile
Re: Question regarding thread derailment rules.
« Reply #60 on: November 15, 2014, 05:05:43 pm »
Zek sent me a PM asking if the PI was real and I told him to ask Abdul himself like he told me to do when I asked if anyones PI has been verified. Then I got banned, lol.
who's the judge of if its funny and or clever? the mods. period.

Offline Spectre

  • Arch Disciple
  • ***
  • Posts: 606
    • View Profile
Re: Question regarding thread derailment rules.
« Reply #61 on: November 15, 2014, 05:07:46 pm »
Zek sent me a PM asking if the PI was real and I told him to ask Abdul himself like he told me to do when I asked if anyones PI has been verified. Then I got banned, lol.

what wonderful modding that in and of itself proves zek is incapable of actually modding this place along with the fact the post he linked was deleted

Offline equanimity

  • Zealot
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,246
    • View Profile
Re: Question regarding thread derailment rules.
« Reply #62 on: November 15, 2014, 05:52:19 pm »
Posting PI, spamming the same post repeatedly:

is what you put in the ban list only post that was "spammed" was the one of your legs

also it doesn't matter how you feel about it he posted a joke Paki Penis is not someones name and you banned someone unfairly you're incompetent just because you reversed it doesn't change the fact you're incompetent 

He posted Paki Penis repeatedly.  That was the post he was spamming; I removed it a bunch.


typicallyequanimity@gmail.com

Offline Spectre

  • Arch Disciple
  • ***
  • Posts: 606
    • View Profile
Re: Question regarding thread derailment rules.
« Reply #63 on: November 15, 2014, 05:54:32 pm »
Posting PI, spamming the same post repeatedly:

is what you put in the ban list only post that was "spammed" was the one of your legs

also it doesn't matter how you feel about it he posted a joke Paki Penis is not someones name and you banned someone unfairly you're incompetent just because you reversed it doesn't change the fact you're incompetent 

He posted Paki Penis repeatedly.  That was the post he was spamming; I removed it a bunch.

so you deleted the posts apparently repeatedly because that's why you're not supposed to do that If you didn't notice

still sounds pretty incompetent even more so now you're really giving fine examples of why you should be demoded/never should have been modded in the first place

Offline equanimity

  • Zealot
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,246
    • View Profile
Re: Question regarding thread derailment rules.
« Reply #64 on: November 15, 2014, 06:03:02 pm »
Yeah posts like that I will remove.  It sucks to be banned for joking around and not even doing anything malicious, but when it comes to serious PI like that I'm not going to let it sit there while I try to figure out what to do with it.  Was PMing him about it, and if he hadn't continued to post it as I considered the matter he never would have been warned.

I'm starting to feel that the verification process is an impractical way of handling PI.


typicallyequanimity@gmail.com

Offline RisiR

  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,710
  • The Anti-Mod
    • View Profile
Re: Question regarding thread derailment rules.
« Reply #65 on: November 15, 2014, 06:11:06 pm »
I'm starting to feel that the verification process is an impractical way of handling PI.
No shit, Sherlock.
who's the judge of if its funny and or clever? the mods. period.

Offline equanimity

  • Zealot
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,246
    • View Profile
Re: Question regarding thread derailment rules.
« Reply #66 on: November 15, 2014, 06:14:00 pm »
yep.


typicallyequanimity@gmail.com

Offline Spectre

  • Arch Disciple
  • ***
  • Posts: 606
    • View Profile
Re: Question regarding thread derailment rules.
« Reply #67 on: November 15, 2014, 06:20:31 pm »
Yeah posts like that I will remove.  It sucks to be banned for joking around and not even doing anything malicious, but when it comes to serious PI like that I'm not going to let it sit there while I try to figure out what to do with it.  Was PMing him about it, and if he hadn't continued to post it as I considered the matter he never would have been warned.

I'm starting to feel that the verification process is an impractical way of handling PI.
no shit what gave you that idea

however it has been stated by arnox over and over posts are to not be removed
actually idio the one who didn't want anyone deleting posts is fucking Arnox as that's what he threatened to demod edify over and he made an entire thread addressing it when you did it now we've had 2 mods do it with no one addressing it both Zek and now Hansen have fucking done it

this is even more double standards and Arnox is very clearly not informing his mods how HE WANTS THE PLACE RUN EVEN

here's some shit you guys should look over

http://www.intosanctuary.com/index.php?topic=400.0

http://www.intosanctuary.com/index.php?topic=3529.0

http://www.intosanctuary.com/index.php?topic=266.0

you're starting to be ridiculous Idio I understand you might have missed some of this but most every thread someone has made complaining there has been precedent for them complaining I understand you don't read everything on here and I don't expect you too but maybe you should start researching how this place is being run and see the very clear hypocrisy and double standards going on here

you are showing even more reasons you should be demoted


http://www.intosanctuary.com/index.php?topic=400.0

http://www.intosanctuary.com/index.php?topic=3529.0

http://www.intosanctuary.com/index.php?topic=266.0

Offline fanglekai

  • Arch Disciple
  • ***
  • Posts: 717
    • View Profile
Re: Question regarding thread derailment rules.
« Reply #68 on: November 15, 2014, 06:23:35 pm »

Offline -SpectraL

  • Commandant
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,605
  • Sinking kidiots since 1989
    • View Profile
Re: Question regarding thread derailment rules.
« Reply #69 on: November 15, 2014, 07:38:29 pm »
http://totse.free-forum.net/


Don't go about it that way, fang. All that is is instant personal gratification/satisfaction, and very rarely produces anything at all constructive. Real progress is like the waves of the sea gradually but relentlessly washing away on the face of the rocks. No sense throwing away your account while there still exists even a slim chance for real change.

Offline equanimity

  • Zealot
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,246
    • View Profile
Re: Question regarding thread derailment rules.
« Reply #70 on: November 15, 2014, 07:51:03 pm »
Yeah posts like that I will remove.  It sucks to be banned for joking around and not even doing anything malicious, but when it comes to serious PI like that I'm not going to let it sit there while I try to figure out what to do with it.  Was PMing him about it, and if he hadn't continued to post it as I considered the matter he never would have been warned.

I'm starting to feel that the verification process is an impractical way of handling PI.
no shit what gave you that idea

however it has been stated by arnox over and over posts are to not be removed
actually idio the one who didn't want anyone deleting posts is fucking Arnox as that's what he threatened to demod edify over and he made an entire thread addressing it when you did it now we've had 2 mods do it with no one addressing it both Zek and now Hansen have fucking done it

this is even more double standards and Arnox is very clearly not informing his mods how HE WANTS THE PLACE RUN EVEN

here's some shit you guys should look over

http://www.intosanctuary.com/index.php?topic=400.0

http://www.intosanctuary.com/index.php?topic=3529.0

http://www.intosanctuary.com/index.php?topic=266.0

you're starting to be ridiculous Idio I understand you might have missed some of this but most every thread someone has made complaining there has been precedent for them complaining I understand you don't read everything on here and I don't expect you too but maybe you should start researching how this place is being run and see the very clear hypocrisy and double standards going on here

you are showing even more reasons you should be demoted


http://www.intosanctuary.com/index.php?topic=400.0

http://www.intosanctuary.com/index.php?topic=3529.0

http://www.intosanctuary.com/index.php?topic=266.0

How would you like to see PI handled?  This goes for everyone.  Let's talk about this stuff.


typicallyequanimity@gmail.com

Offline RisiR

  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,710
  • The Anti-Mod
    • View Profile
Re: Question regarding thread derailment rules.
« Reply #71 on: November 15, 2014, 08:00:43 pm »
The point of talking things out has long been crossed by the Admin not talking anything out, instead ignoring literally every single complaint about his staff. His half ass attempts at fresh starts can fuck right off. That nigger didn't even apologize for being a liar.

Fuck this shit.
who's the judge of if its funny and or clever? the mods. period.

Offline -SpectraL

  • Commandant
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,605
  • Sinking kidiots since 1989
    • View Profile
Re: Question regarding thread derailment rules.
« Reply #72 on: November 15, 2014, 08:01:55 pm »

You, as a member of the staff, should not even be asking a question like that of the general userbase. It's something you should already know the answer to. Pandering to it, entertaining it and inviting it only encourages it.

Offline Spectre

  • Arch Disciple
  • ***
  • Posts: 606
    • View Profile
Re: Question regarding thread derailment rules.
« Reply #73 on: November 15, 2014, 08:02:08 pm »
How would you like to see PI handled?  This goes for everyone.  Let's talk about this stuff.

it has been talked about and it has nothing to do with the fact that you keep ignoring what was decided and are deleting posts that you aren't supposed to you aren't even following the shit arnox the admin you keep saying is great said to do

fuck off with that we can talk about it you should be demodded period full stop

Offline Slave of the Beast

  • Arch Disciple
  • ***
  • Posts: 789
    • View Profile
Re: Question regarding thread derailment rules.
« Reply #74 on: November 15, 2014, 08:09:28 pm »
Zek doesn't know what to do. Ban Risir but edit Lanny for the same 'offence'. Just makes it up as he goes along. I wonder what excuses Arnox will make for him. Speaking of making excuses, first things first...

Blatant thread derailment is different from normal conversation flow.

Please read the OP of this thread for clarification:

http://www.intosanctuary.com/index.php?topic=3529.0

Quote
Off-topic posting is NOT against the rules UNLESS it's blatant derailing such as the following.

"Have you guys ever gone snowboarding before?"

"I like whipped cream LOL."

This however is normal conversation flow.

"I really like pizza."

"Especially ones with pepperoni toppings."

"I think pepperoni's pretty gross..."

It's not blatant derailing because it took you more than one irrelevant, low content, post to derail a thread? I'll remember that for future reference. :facepalm:

That being the case, why was Fang' banned for 'derailing' Equanimity's shitty H&S troll thread? Even though every post Fang' made referred to something that was either said in that thread, or the thread itself? In reality were tears shed because his posts may have been relevant, but they weren't parlour enough?

In contrast:

due to physicalicol problems

every1 be super nice to him ok?

physicalicol

Blatant derailing: First post after OP. Immediate derailment; may as well have typed 'Lrn2spl'. Too much of a passive-agressive prick to do that so just quoted instead.

Medical necessity, not physiological necessity.  I mean that's their verbiage, in my experience.

What treatments and medications would help people cope with this?  Could zombify them with hardcore drugs, but why would you?  They can lead full lives without that junk, so long's they get the HRT and surgeries they need.

there is not a medical need they body will continue to function perfectly healthy perhaps even more healthy than a body on HRT and surgeries

there are a lot of people that express improvements simply through counseling there isn't a 100% perfect treatment for any mental health illness at all

I'm kinda bored of this now.

way to make an entirely unnecessary spam post in a thread that has remained on topic  :tup:

I do what I can.

Wait no:



Blatant derailing: That's nice. Just as whipped cream has nothing to do with snowboarding, so Zek's tiredness has nothing to do with the topic at hand. He then doesn't even deny he's derailing; responds with sarcasm. Follows that up with a derailing shitpost.

...

Zek (And I've barely, barely scratched the surface) makes derailing posts that follow on from nothing, just as your "blatant derailing" example shows, because he knows that you will blindly excuse double standards as he's one of your 'very carefully picked' and 'professional' staff members who is 'nice'. Contrary to what you may claim, that's all that really registers on your radar. And why should he think otherwise? You gormlessly treat his 'cats n' hugs forum' suggestion seriously  whereas everyone else shat on the obvious wind-up, including Fang' who got the boot for his harshness, thereby proving to Equazek that you're a real Autisticus Maximus obsessed with 'parlour' behaviour.

... in you're own time, Arnox.