It was me who did the unjust moderating. They violated Rule #1, specifically this part:
"This means posts that are not relevant or do not add anything at all to the thread or the discussion in it."
The posts in question were not relevant, and did not add to the discussion. If anything, they detracted from the discussion and caused back-and-forth bickering.
Arnox, I am disappointed by this thread. Though I appreciate you trying to clear things up for the userbase, it is not a good leadership quality to publicly reprimand someone or discuss staff affairs. That's why you have your hidden forums for staff only. Or you could PM me about it. Instead, you decide make a thread in the official News of the Sanctuary forum, highlighting the poor choices of just one moderator. Don't waste everyone else's time with this.
Since staff affairs and disputes are now publicly discussed, let's review your Official Moderating Policies. This is how you would like us to handle violations of Rule #1:
"Rule 1: Flooding the site is an automatic permaban. Ban and hard delete all spammed posts. Anything else though, give 'em a warning."
I didn't think it warranted an infraction, but it looks like we are handing those out like candy now. Since it wasn't true spam (it was just not relevant), I didn't hard delete the posts. Feel free to restore them from the Recycle Bin.
Thanks for clearing it up for everyone, boss. You might want to update your rules so they are less ambiguous.