I am so fucking tired of you faggots constantly complaining about the site

[joe camel]

There's nothing but complaining and flaming, the vacuous banality of the content here is horrid. I don't understand why either, is this just mostly a community of basement dwellers and aspies? How do people become so easily appalled with such trivial issues of a website? Take BM off of hot topics for Christ's sake its getting embarrassing.
[/quote

Something has to be done. Can we just ban all the people whi do nothing but bitch?

[Slave of the Beast]

Even Slave seems to be writing more about how everyone else sucks than he is contributing quality content.

Run your weasel-worded mouth at me in B&M and you'd better have the evidence to support what you say. Which we both know full well that you don't, so kindly fuck off and smear someone else with your drivel.

[equanimity]

http://www.intosanctuary.com/index.php?topic=2885.msg39615#msg39615

I only mean stuff like this, and your post quality thread (though that turned out to be awesome). You're good most of the time but this is just so negative...

[-SpectraL]

Yeah, like constructive criticism should be labeled as negative just to make people feel better about themselves.

[equanimity]

Yeah, like constructive criticism should be labeled as negative just to make people feel better about themselves.

Pointing out a typo in lieu of responding to an apt post adds nothing constructive to a conversation. And now I'm being too negative!  So I'll see you guys later today. Bye

[Arnox]

All I see is trolls trolling trolls trolling trolls mostly.

[Slave of the Beast]

Even Slave seems to be writing more about how everyone else sucks than he is contributing quality content.

http://www.intosanctuary.com/index.php?topic=2885.msg39615#msg39615

I only mean stuff like this, and your post quality thread (though that turned out to be awesome). You're good most of the time but this is just so negative...

I disagree with people, including you, over a site policy and am prepared to defend my point. You find this enough to shit-smear me by declaring that generally I'm 'writing more about how everyone else sucks'. You then quickly back-peddle in the scope of your comment and try to placate me with some insipid fake praise.

Well at least that answers the Zek question; you're a genuine cunt.

[RisiR]

All I see is trolls trolling trolls trolling trolls mostly.

I didn't troll you until I realized that that's exactly the only thing you want to see. As soon as someone critizises anything he's trolling and trying to see the forum burn. That's such bullshit.

I'm not sure if you're even trying anymore or if you've settled with that "Let it be" "They are only here to see the forum go down" mentality.

Sadface. Tear.

[Arnox]

I disagree with people, including you, over a site policy and am prepared to defend my point. You find this enough to shit-smear me by declaring that generally I'm 'writing more about how everyone else sucks'. You then quickly back-peddle in the scope of your comment and try to placate me with some insipid fake praise.

> Says he doesn't talk about how people around here suck at all.
> Basically tells equanimity that she's a cunt.

That doesn't do very much to help your case there...

[equanimity]

Well at least that answers the Zek question; you're a genuine cunt.

You must meet a lot of genuine cunts, Slave.

[Slave of the Beast]

I disagree with people, including you, over a site policy and am prepared to defend my point. You find this enough to shit-smear me by declaring that generally I'm 'writing more about how everyone else sucks'. You then quickly back-peddle in the scope of your comment and try to placate me with some insipid fake praise.

Well at least that answers the Zek question; you're a genuine cunt.

You must meet a lot of genuine cunts, Slave.

Piss-poor comeback that completely avoids the issue; you've nothing worthwhile to say in response.

Do yourself a favour and slither back under your stone.

I disagree with people, including you, over a site policy and am prepared to defend my point. You find this enough to shit-smear me by declaring that generally I'm 'writing more about how everyone else sucks'. You then quickly back-peddle in the scope of your comment and try to placate me with some insipid fake praise.

> Says he doesn't talk about how people around here suck at all.
> Basically tells equanimity that she's a cunt.

That doesn't do very much to help your case there...

White Knighting doesn't work well with being disingenuous.

Quote the specific part of my post where I say that.

[Tokolosh]

Well at least that answers the Zek question; you're a genuine cunt.

genuine cunt.

What he'd do to have one of those.

[-SpectraL]

Yeah, like constructive criticism should be labeled as negative just to make people feel better about themselves.

Pointing out a typo in lieu of responding to an apt post adds nothing constructive to a conversation. And now I'm being too negative!  So I'll see you guys later today. Bye

Hey. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. If I fuck with someone over a typo, it's merely to create some amusement, it's not for a malicious purpose. I never said the forum needs to be stale and boring, I said it needs to stick to the mission statement and not pander to kidiots whose only purpose here is attention-whoring and drawing attention to themselves constantly. A little fun wit someone never hurts, but constant spamming and continuous shitdropping and PI and CP and all that other kidiot stuff is not "having fun", it's merely annoying and tiresome.

[Slave of the Beast]

This thread demonstrates that if Equanimity discredits you generally as a poster, entirely unprovoked in a thread that has nothing to do with you, based on a single sentence elsewhere on the site, and you effortlessly tear her a new asshole, Arnox will come White Knighting in and imply that he agrees with her; that you have recently become a generally poor poster based on a whole two sentences - one of which is your response to Equanimity's sweeping bullshit...a response he hasn't even read properly.

Arnox, you've made it clear that you don't give a flying fuck whether Equanimity stirs up shit against one of the few active users you have here, it's Equanimity you'll actively and blindly side with. Should I fuck off now, rather than wait for the logical conclusion, i.e. this account being fucked over because I've upset your pet with another sentence she doesn't like and been drawn into this kind of bullshit?

You were warned this thin-skinned whiner didn't have the spine for the job but you just don't care, do you?

[Arnox]

You find this enough to shit-smear me by declaring that generally I'm 'writing more about how everyone else sucks'.

You're directly implying that that's not all you do around here. And then you come back with some flames.

EDIT: And oh my goodness, she really got to your head, didn't she?