Author Topic: I'm still of the opinion that  (Read 1615 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline starvingniglet

  • Commandant
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,690
    • View Profile
Re: I'm still of the opinion that
« Reply #15 on: October 13, 2014, 05:53:41 pm »
No way, lol.

see?  you are the hotdog that someone threw down the hallway
Quote from: constantinople
Wow fighting and banging indiscrimenantly, the hallmarks of a repsectable individual.

Offline RisiR

  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,710
  • The Anti-Mod
    • View Profile
Re: I'm still of the opinion that
« Reply #16 on: October 13, 2014, 10:02:51 pm »
-Spectral....
who's the judge of if its funny and or clever? the mods. period.

Offline Lanny

  • Zealot
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,123
    • View Profile
Re: I'm still of the opinion that
« Reply #17 on: October 13, 2014, 10:59:15 pm »
Have you tried to create an alternative website, Spectral? A strict one without kidiots and lulz?

Did it work?

Quoting for an answer.

Offline -SpectraL

  • Commandant
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,605
  • Sinking kidiots since 1989
    • View Profile
Re: I'm still of the opinion that
« Reply #18 on: October 13, 2014, 11:07:17 pm »
Have you tried to create an alternative website, Spectral? A strict one without kidiots and lulz?

Did it work?

Quoting for an answer.

I won't answer that question, because answering any irrelevant, secondary questions would only serve to encourage a complete and utter duck and dive to the initial issue I raised. Once our question has been fully answered, then we can discuss your evasive questions and misdirection.

Offline Lanny

  • Zealot
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,123
    • View Profile
Re: I'm still of the opinion that
« Reply #19 on: October 13, 2014, 11:13:28 pm »
Nice bait but for once I'm not going to take it. There have been more than enough threads derailed by this particular drama already. Make a thread in B&M if you want to have a cry over it.

Offline RisiR

  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,710
  • The Anti-Mod
    • View Profile
Re: I'm still of the opinion that
« Reply #20 on: October 13, 2014, 11:34:36 pm »
I've re-read your posts but couldn't find a single questionmark.

What questions do you want me to answer?
who's the judge of if its funny and or clever? the mods. period.

Offline -SpectraL

  • Commandant
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,605
  • Sinking kidiots since 1989
    • View Profile
Re: I'm still of the opinion that
« Reply #21 on: October 13, 2014, 11:37:08 pm »
Nice bait but for once I'm not going to take it. There have been more than enough threads derailed by this particular drama already. Make a thread in B&M if you want to have a cry over it.

Have it your way, kid.

Offline Zanick

  • Disciple
  • ***
  • Posts: 273
    • View Profile
Re: I'm still of the opinion that
« Reply #22 on: October 14, 2014, 12:42:11 am »
I think I agree. Lanny was one of my favorites on Zoklet. I know Slave modded some of my forums prior to my modship, and while I wasn't aware of him then, I think I like him based on the stickies and other relics he had left behind before I joined the team.

Offline DaGuru

  • Arch Disciple
  • ***
  • Posts: 738
    • View Profile
Re: I'm still of the opinion that
« Reply #23 on: October 14, 2014, 10:41:48 am »


Quoting for an answer.

Funny how Lanny enters the thread to only talk about empty rhetorical nonsense, all the while completely avoiding the factual history that has been discussed...


Lanny has already shown he can't be trusted with any kind of authority. I mean, what mod bans a member who has broken no rules over three thousand times just because that member has an opinion or thought that creates personal butthurt? I mean, if the person was spamming or flooding or posting PI or CP, the sure, ban that person. But reading a person's post and not agreeing with it and whipping out the handy mod control panel to "take care of that person" is simply the height of abuse of authority, not to mention incredibly lame. This is what Lanny did. Regardless of his technical knowledge, Lanny has the mindset that killed both &Totse and Zoklet. He has proven time and again to be a real lousy person to give any authority to. His own "friends" booted him off the staff and even went as far as to ban his lame ass right off the site permanently. And you want this proven loser to have a staff control panel here?? Riiiight.



Quoting for its poignant accuracy.

And no, of course Lanny isn't mod material....because even if you ignore his impulsive power games like some raging toddler....he's already proven how much of a spastic kidiot he is on here. From his spamming quote boxes, to his techy silly games of playing with text, he is NOT here for adult informational discussion....instead just to play like the petulant child that he is.

Offline Lanny

  • Zealot
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,123
    • View Profile
Re: I'm still of the opinion that
« Reply #24 on: October 14, 2014, 03:05:47 pm »
lol could you repeat that? I couldn't hear you over all your pedophilia.

Offline RisiR

  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,710
  • The Anti-Mod
    • View Profile
Re: I'm still of the opinion that
« Reply #25 on: October 15, 2014, 10:55:22 am »
Quote
empty rhetorical nonsense
None of my questions where empty rhetorical nonsense.

Quote
Have you tried to create an alternative website, Spectral? A strict one without kidiots and lulz?

Did it work?

Is it empty rhetorical nonsense because - of course - he didn't try a strict alternative website and  - of course - it therefor didn't work?

I really don't see the empty rhetorical nonsense you are talking about.
who's the judge of if its funny and or clever? the mods. period.

Offline DaGuru

  • Arch Disciple
  • ***
  • Posts: 738
    • View Profile
Re: I'm still of the opinion that
« Reply #26 on: October 15, 2014, 11:17:10 am »


Is it empty rhetorical nonsense because - of course - he didn't try a strict alternative website and  - of course - it therefor didn't work?

I really don't see the empty rhetorical nonsense you are talking about.

It IS empty rhetorical nonsense, because one doesn't need to go through the same machinations of operating something to make a sound judgement. If I walk into a restaurant and take a bite out of my burger, and find that it is still pink and cold in the middle....can I make the declaration that the chef fucked up and/or doesn't have a clue what he is doing? Or do I really need to go open a restaurant myself before I can make a credible and qualified assessment of someone's lousy cooking?

One can still determine what "garbage" is, without becoming a garbage man as his livelihood. :P

Offline RisiR

  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,710
  • The Anti-Mod
    • View Profile
Re: I'm still of the opinion that
« Reply #27 on: October 15, 2014, 11:26:07 am »
Yea... ok. That might be true but he could've just answered the damn questions.

I wasn't trying to be rhetorical at first I was honestly asking him if he tried to open a site himself. The "Did it work?" part was rhetorical I admit.

So...

Quote
Have you tried to create an alternative website, Spectral? A strict one without kidiots and lulz?

Better?
who's the judge of if its funny and or clever? the mods. period.

Offline Slave of the Beast

  • Arch Disciple
  • ***
  • Posts: 789
    • View Profile
Re: I'm still of the opinion that
« Reply #28 on: October 15, 2014, 12:19:27 pm »
What was Slave like as mod, does anyone remember?  From his posts here he seems obsessed with post quality,...

I make one tongue-in-cheek 'Slave Equation' thread in SG and Candyfloss here thinks I'm 'obssessed with post quality'. What makes it funny is that 'she' is so...

http://www.intosanctuary.com/index.php?topic=2885.msg39615#msg39615

I only mean stuff like this, and your post quality thread (though that turned out to be awesome). You're good most of the time but this is just so negative...

... breathtakingly two-faced about it. Then again at least it's consistent with the rest of her baseless shit-smearing:

Equanimity was modded not just because "she was nice", but because she was fair, professional, able to keep her cool, and seems to have a good understanding and belief of totse ideals, and she's not a complete dunce.

 
...and that gives me the impression he'd be handing out bans like Halloween candy.  But he definitely didn't make as many waves as Meta did on totse,...

So you don't remember what I was like as a mod on Totse, yet you remember I didn't create as many waves as Meta did... 'on totse'. Forget Dr Watson, clearly this is a case for Mr Holmes:

Clearly you do remember me, Zek Equanimity. After all you do have such a fine grasp on those Totse ideals; whining over how nasty people are then trying to undermine them by spreading bullshit about them, as you are with me, yet again. I wonder if Arnox will be in here shortly to repeat the exercise of making a tit of himself trying to defend you. In Zok's TTFN I explicitly condemned the infraction system, the abuses of it and my own revulsion and near-refusal to use it as a former mod (because I didn't need to). A post that was repeatedly thanked, not refuted, by people who unlike you aren't full of obsequious passive-aggressive faggotry.

 
...so he probably deserves the benefit of doubt.

Sure. You don't like me. I get it. But you'd like Arnox to still think you're a victim of unpleasantness  so you sign off your lies like you think someone who's a nice little girl should. 'I tried to be kind Arnox, but Slave was so mean in his reply, boo hoo hooo!' Go back to the Disney Channel if I upset you so much and take your garbage opinions with you.

To Arnox, if you do read this:

God knows, it's a long-standing totse tradition that an Admin mod's at least one retard or asshole, but you need to rectify this nonsense because IntoSanctuary simply doesn't have the economy of scale to hide a turd like E' for long. If the majority of the userbase don't fucking want someone as a mod then the Admin/owner saying 'but it's my site' is like pissing into the wind. Except when the wind drops it doesn't mean you've won, it means people are going elsewhere and your site is dying because of your stubborness.

In this case it doesn't matter if you insist she's so far abided by your rules for mods and your reasons for modding her were sound (!?), she's turning you into a laughing stock.
« Last Edit: October 15, 2014, 12:21:48 pm by Slave of the Beast »

Offline Jesus Christ

  • Adherent
  • *
  • Posts: 28
    • View Profile
Re: I'm still of the opinion that
« Reply #29 on: October 15, 2014, 02:08:45 pm »
What was Slave like as mod, does anyone remember?  From his posts here he seems obsessed with post quality,...

I make one tongue-in-cheek 'Slave Equation' thread in SG and Candyfloss here thinks I'm 'obssessed with post quality'. What makes it funny is that 'she' is so...

http://www.intosanctuary.com/index.php?topic=2885.msg39615#msg39615

I only mean stuff like this, and your post quality thread (though that turned out to be awesome). You're good most of the time but this is just so negative...

... breathtakingly two-faced about it. Then again at least it's consistent with the rest of her baseless shit-smearing:

Equanimity was modded not just because "she was nice", but because she was fair, professional, able to keep her cool, and seems to have a good understanding and belief of totse ideals, and she's not a complete dunce.

 
...and that gives me the impression he'd be handing out bans like Halloween candy.  But he definitely didn't make as many waves as Meta did on totse,...

So you don't remember what I was like as a mod on Totse, yet you remember I didn't create as many waves as Meta did... 'on totse'. Forget Dr Watson, clearly this is a case for Mr Holmes:

Clearly you do remember me, Zek Equanimity. After all you do have such a fine grasp on those Totse ideals; whining over how nasty people are then trying to undermine them by spreading bullshit about them, as you are with me, yet again. I wonder if Arnox will be in here shortly to repeat the exercise of making a tit of himself trying to defend you. In Zok's TTFN I explicitly condemned the infraction system, the abuses of it and my own revulsion and near-refusal to use it as a former mod (because I didn't need to). A post that was repeatedly thanked, not refuted, by people who unlike you aren't full of obsequious passive-aggressive faggotry.

 
...so he probably deserves the benefit of doubt.

Sure. You don't like me. I get it. But you'd like Arnox to still think you're a victim of unpleasantness  so you sign off your lies like you think someone who's a nice little girl should. 'I tried to be kind Arnox, but Slave was so mean in his reply, boo hoo hooo!' Go back to the Disney Channel if I upset you so much and take your garbage opinions with you.

To Arnox, if you do read this:

God knows, it's a long-standing totse tradition that an Admin mod's at least one retard or asshole, but you need to rectify this nonsense because IntoSanctuary simply doesn't have the economy of scale to hide a turd like E' for long. If the majority of the userbase don't fucking want someone as a mod then the Admin/owner saying 'but it's my site' is like pissing into the wind. Except when the wind drops it doesn't mean you've won, it means people are going elsewhere and your site is dying because of your stubborness.

In this case it doesn't matter if you insist she's so far abided by your rules for mods and your reasons for modding her were sound (!?), she's turning you into a laughing stock.

preach it, brother!  sanctuary needs SLAVE as mod!