Author Topic: Retarded banning's  (Read 6020 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Spectre

  • Arch Disciple
  • ***
  • Posts: 606
    • View Profile
Re: Retarded banning's
« Reply #105 on: November 13, 2014, 10:18:34 pm »
Unban fanglekai

this guy would approve:



#unbanfang2014

Offline Tupac Shakur

  • Devotee
  • **
  • Posts: 187
  • Makaveli the Don
    • View Profile
Re: Retarded banning's
« Reply #106 on: November 13, 2014, 11:15:17 pm »
Quote from: starvingniglet link=topic=4637.msg60025#msg60025
we need an alternative to this place, before 'sanctuary' becomes the graveyard of what is left of our community
Jesus Christ dude there's one right in front of your face. Facepalm

No names being said tho

Youuu...  :frown:

My asshole is still sore from you bb

Could have used Vaseline if you'd just asked. ;)

yes but oil based lube breaks condoms and i don't want your pesky nigger aids  8)

Offline Spectre

  • Arch Disciple
  • ***
  • Posts: 606
    • View Profile
Re: Retarded banning's
« Reply #107 on: November 17, 2014, 04:06:59 am »
fanglekai   Advertising and spamming. http://www.intosanctuary.com/index.php?topic=4724.msg61307#msg61307 http://www.intosanctuary.com/index.php?topic=4724.msg61331#msg61331

this one here is a new one to ad to the list of retarded banning's this shit was already sorted out the other day and you come back and ban him for the same thing AGAIN are you mental

Offline -SpectraL

  • Commandant
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,605
  • Sinking kidiots since 1989
    • View Profile
Re: Retarded banning's
« Reply #108 on: November 17, 2014, 05:05:29 pm »

Both helladamnleet's and fanglekai's bans are completely frivolous and unproductive and should be reversed at once.

Offline Spectre

  • Arch Disciple
  • ***
  • Posts: 606
    • View Profile
Re: Retarded banning's
« Reply #109 on: November 17, 2014, 05:07:44 pm »

Both helladamnleet's and fanglekai's bans are completely frivolous and unproductive and should be reversed at once.

agreed along with the fact they were instituted BEFORE he even made a change to his rule on advertising AND their posts had been made a day prior

Offline -SpectraL

  • Commandant
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,605
  • Sinking kidiots since 1989
    • View Profile
Re: Retarded banning's
« Reply #110 on: November 17, 2014, 05:12:52 pm »

I'd have to concede that fang shouldn't have been spamming the link across multiple discussion threads, but a one week ban for that is ridiculous. A stern warning would have sufficed. Even better, just chatting with him about it in a friendly manner with some genuine reason and sensible logic would have actually accomplished something. All Arnox is accomplishing with this move is driving the userbase even more against him, and that will lose him even more members than banning adverts to other BBS sites.

Offline Spectre

  • Arch Disciple
  • ***
  • Posts: 606
    • View Profile
Re: Retarded banning's
« Reply #111 on: November 17, 2014, 05:19:36 pm »

I'd have to concede that fang shouldn't have been spamming the link across multiple discussion threads, but a one week ban for that is ridiculous. A stern warning would have sufficed. Even better, just chatting with him about it in a friendly manner with some genuine reason and sensible logic would have actually accomplished something. All Arnox is accomplishing with this move is driving the userbase even more against him, and that will lose him even more members than banning adverts to other BBS sites.

he had posted it in multiple threads yes but it was addressed by Idio when it happened and fang respected what he said and left it to his one thread that was 2 days before this ban this entire situation had been resolved with idio before arnox banned him again for the same thing he reversed just a day or 2 prior

you can see the post he was banned for and it was made on the 15th

Offline -SpectraL

  • Commandant
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,605
  • Sinking kidiots since 1989
    • View Profile
Re: Retarded banning's
« Reply #112 on: November 17, 2014, 05:46:33 pm »

I'd have to concede that fang shouldn't have been spamming the link across multiple discussion threads, but a one week ban for that is ridiculous. A stern warning would have sufficed. Even better, just chatting with him about it in a friendly manner with some genuine reason and sensible logic would have actually accomplished something. All Arnox is accomplishing with this move is driving the userbase even more against him, and that will lose him even more members than banning adverts to other BBS sites.

he had posted it in multiple threads yes but it was addressed by Idio when it happened and fang respected what he said and left it to his one thread that was 2 days before this ban this entire situation had been resolved with idio before arnox banned him again for the same thing he reversed just a day or 2 prior

you can see the post he was banned for and it was made on the 15th

Yep. I knew. The whole thing is utter bullshit. Arnox comes in a day late and a dollar short and two members are illegitimately banned. According to Arnox's own standards, he should now be required to remove himself from the staff, since he "holds the staff to the highest of standards". Obviously, that "highest standard" was deliberately missed in this case.

Offline Tupac Shakur

  • Devotee
  • **
  • Posts: 187
  • Makaveli the Don
    • View Profile
Re: Retarded banning's
« Reply #113 on: November 18, 2014, 06:40:42 pm »
Yet another retarded ban. Master Shake, a member of LLZ was saying LLZ has better quality threads and they prefer quality over quantity IN A THREAD NAMED LONGLIVEZOKLET. One mod said they were okay with the discussion as long as there was no blatant advertising and to keep it in this thread. I later on return to the same thread to see he is banned. You staff members are fucking autistic and incompetent

Offline starvingniglet

  • Commandant
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,690
    • View Profile
Re: Retarded banning's
« Reply #114 on: November 18, 2014, 07:21:12 pm »
Yet another retarded ban. Master Shake, a member of LLZ was saying LLZ has better quality threads and they prefer quality over quantity IN A THREAD NAMED LONGLIVEZOKLET. One mod said they were okay with the discussion as long as there was no blatant advertising and to keep it in this thread. I later on return to the same thread to see he is banned. You staff members are fucking autistic and incompetent

hah its pretty fucking bad here when llz people are calling the staff here incompetent
Quote from: constantinople
Wow fighting and banging indiscrimenantly, the hallmarks of a repsectable individual.

Offline -SpectraL

  • Commandant
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,605
  • Sinking kidiots since 1989
    • View Profile
Re: Retarded banning's
« Reply #115 on: November 18, 2014, 07:28:13 pm »

Truth be told, he was spamming his pitch all over a bunch of threads across the entire board, but did anyone on the staff actually ask him to stop, or did they just stand there silent and ban him once it reached a certain level? That's a question I think I already know the answer to, considering how the helladamleet and fang accounts were mistreated. I'll lay money there was no real line of communication opened with him on the subject at all, and that now we're gonna get a steady stream of bullshit about how that was actually tried.

Offline starvingniglet

  • Commandant
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,690
    • View Profile
Re: Retarded banning's
« Reply #116 on: November 18, 2014, 07:42:20 pm »
now we're gonna get a steady stream of bullshit about how that was actually tried.

more like dismissive hand-waving followed by total silence...thats the arnox way
Quote from: constantinople
Wow fighting and banging indiscrimenantly, the hallmarks of a repsectable individual.

Offline BallsDeep69

  • Arch Disciple
  • ***
  • Posts: 613
  • So skilled, I trolled Arnox and got away with it..
    • View Profile
Re: Retarded banning's
« Reply #117 on: November 18, 2014, 10:29:16 pm »
Yet another retarded ban. Master Shake, a member of LLZ was saying LLZ has better quality threads and they prefer quality over quantity IN A THREAD NAMED LONGLIVEZOKLET. One mod said they were okay with the discussion as long as there was no blatant advertising and to keep it in this thread. I later on return to the same thread to see he is banned. You staff members are fucking autistic and incompetent

hah its pretty fucking bad here when llz people are calling the staff here incompetent
Well... Hate to say it, but he's right.

now we're gonna get a steady stream of bullshit about how that was actually tried.

more like dismissive hand-waving followed by total silence...thats the arnox way
Dismissive hand waving followed by silence, followed by bullshit claims then followed by bans to anyone still complaining.
My will, as it were.
To Zek, get over the fucking kittens man.

To RisiR, you'll always be my favourite hater.

To -SpectraL, you're one of the only people here who can insult Arnox without ramming it down his throat.

To Arnox, fuck you.

Offline Spectre

  • Arch Disciple
  • ***
  • Posts: 606
    • View Profile
Re: Retarded banning's
« Reply #118 on: November 18, 2014, 11:15:24 pm »
be silent and ban dissenters great way to foster good will in the user base and will certainly not trigger the Streisand effect at all