I nominate Bling for mod of Science of the Damned

[RisiR]

You're bringing the site down, Arnox. Ban yourself for a very long time.

[Slave of the Beast]

Just out of interest is that because you don't trust the userbase (say a poll, with a clear favourite, was taken rather than a nomination) or because you don't think Bling is appropriate?

I don't think Bling is appropriate and this board has too small of a userbase to support having board moderators right now.

If the userbase reaches a point where more moderators are required, will you allow the userbase to select mods, within reason, or will they have no say in the matter?

[Arnox]

You're bringing the site down, Arnox. Ban yourself for a very long time.

lol Ban me and I hax this whole site. I'll bring this site down to the ground!

If the userbase reaches a point where more moderators are required, will you allow the userbase to select mods, within reason, or will they have no say in the matter?

The current staff will have a say but that's about it.

[Slave of the Beast]

If the userbase reaches a point where more moderators are required, will you allow the userbase to select mods, within reason, or will they have no say in the matter?

The current staff will have a say but that's about it.

Why limit the discussion to the staff?

[RisiR]

You're bringing the site down, Arnox. Ban yourself for a very long time.

lol Ban me and I hax this whole site. I'll bring this site down to the ground!

lol You rage-banned me because you lost your temper. Don't forget that, big boy.

[mark311]

I vote for myself , nice copy cat thread mark... http://www.intosanctuary.com/index.php?topic=4018.0

It's a copy cat thread that seriously got out of hand lol

[Arnox]

Why limit the discussion to the staff?

Because this is not a democracy.

lol You rage-banned me because you lost your temper. Don't forget that, big boy.

Nope. I've never banned anyone purely out of emotion.

[Σ]

If the userbase reaches a point where more moderators are required, will you allow the userbase to select mods, within reason, or will they have no say in the matter?

The current staff will have a say but that's about it.

Why limit the discussion to the staff?

Because they have a better eye for who is a objectively good poster than the regular users who would want people like sploo in a mod position.

[RisiR]

Keep lying to yourself. I can justify lots of shit with my own made up rules, too.

You banned me because you couldn't handle the heat. Fact.

inb4spamallammadindong.

[Slave of the Beast]

If the userbase reaches a point where more moderators are required, will you allow the userbase to select mods, within reason, or will they have no say in the matter?

The current staff will have a say but that's about it.

Why limit the discussion to the staff?

Because they have a better eye for who is a objectively good poster than the regular users who would want people like sploo in a mod position.

Has anyone conducted a userbase poll that indicated Sploo, or a user like him, would be the primary mod nominee?

Why limit the discussion to the staff?

Because this is not a democracy.

So you'd ignore a valid, userbase-selected, candidate purely on a matter of principle?

[RisiR]

If the userbase reaches a point where more moderators are required, will you allow the userbase to select mods, within reason, or will they have no say in the matter?

The current staff will have a say but that's about it.

Why limit the discussion to the staff?

Because they have a better eye for who is a objectively good poster than the regular users who would want people like sploo in a mod position.

Arnox is a 22 year old mormon virgin and he's somehow wiser and more objective than the rest of the userbase because...?

equanimity....?

Idiosyncrasy , Rocklin and MoaningLisa... yea well....

[Arnox]

So you'd ignore a valid, userbase-selected, candidate purely on a matter of principle?

If someone's been a quality poster, I'll notice it. Or the staff will. Either one.

[RisiR]

So you'd ignore a valid, userbase-selected, candidate purely on a matter of principle?

If someone's been a quality poster, I'll notice it. Or the staff will. Either one.

You are delusional.

[Infinityshock]

So you'd ignore a valid, userbase-selected, candidate purely on a matter of principle?

If someone's been a quality poster, I'll notice it. Or the staff will. Either one.

You have no idea what a moderator is supposed to do

What you're describing is a mod the actually moderates a particular sub-forum to ensure proper flow of topics

Global mods arw supposed to clean up the shit

The only thing the mods here do is ban people for stupid shit...ergo, they are not moderator, they are ban-happy banners

[Infinityshock]

Why limit the discussion to the staff?

Because this is not a democracy.

lol You rage-banned me because you lost your temper. Don't forget that, big boy.

Nope. I've never banned anyone purely out of emotion.

Retarded could technically be considered an emotion