Gay bashing

[starvingniglet]

"obviously false that homosexuals can't have monogamous relationships"

 

[Lanny]

nice scientific denialism there m8

[starvingniglet]

nice scientific denialism there m8

Now faggotry is 'scientific'.  There is 'scientific evidence' that it is ok.  Get the fuck outta here, you gotta be kidding me. 

I am sure there are a tiny minority, maybe like 1%, of 'gays' that are monogamous.  Just enough that you can dredge one up and dust it off as an example to 'prove' that multiple sexual partners is not the norm in the 'gay' 'community'.

[Lanny]

maybe like 1%, of 'gays' that are monogamous.

Nice claim, now can you back it up? And you still haven't addressed the fact that you can't make a jump from a descriptive claim about monogamy in homosexual populations to a normative claim about the permissibility of homosexuality.

[Pestilence]

GOD HATES FAGS

[starvingniglet]

you can't make a jump from a descriptive claim about monogamy in homosexual populations to a normative claim about the permissibility of homosexuality.

I did, though.  It relates to being able to control ones' sexual urges, which monogamy is a perfect example of.  If one cannot control oneself, I consider that type of action to be on the wrong end of the morality scale.   

[Lanny]

I did, though.  It relates to being able to control ones' sexual urges, which monogamy is a perfect example of.  If one cannot control oneself, I consider that type of action to be on the wrong end of the morality scale.   

Monogamy is not the only possible display of impulse control nor is the absence of the former evidence for absence of the latter. If you want to claim that's the case then you have to show that.

Also you haven't come up with evidence for your 1% figure.

[starvingniglet]

Monogamy is not the only possible display of impulse control nor is the absence of the former evidence for absence of the latter. If you want to claim that's the case then you have to show that.

Also you haven't come up with evidence for your 1% figure.

I am sorry, the results of my sociological research study on monogamy in the faggot community is not yet complete, so you will have to wait on the results of that, for, like, well, like forever.

Split hairs all you want, you know what I am saying is true.  All of humanity knows it is true.  That is why it is an insult to call someone a 'faggot' etc.  No one calls people 'lesbians' or 'dykes' to insult them, because everyone knows that shit is fucking awesome.  Except for like eileen wuornos-type lesbians, those are unacceptible as well.

[Lanny]

So what you're saying is that you have no solid evidence? And that you're "derp fags r bad" position is just a faith claim? Well I can't say it surprises me.

[RisiR]

[starvingniglet]

So what you're saying is that you have no solid evidence? And that you're "derp fags r bad" position is just a faith claim? Well I can't say it surprises me.

I could probably dredge up more than one link that supports my position, but I never do that in an argument.  If one has to pull up links to back up what they are saying then they have already lost the argument. 

I could probably find a link that says sasquatch is real or that the tooth fairy exists, what the fuck good does a link do?  If someone reading this wants to look it up for themselves, what is stopping them?  You know as well as I do that most gays are not monogamous, you just want to play splitting hairs games where you will claim victory if I cannot find 'evidence' online that only 1% , and exactly 1%, of gays are monogamous. 

[Lanny]

I could probably dredge up more than one link that supports my position, but I never do that in an argument.  If one has to pull up links to back up what they are saying then they have already lost the argument. 

"As soon as you have to present evidence you've lost the argument"
lol

You know as well as I do that most gays are not monogamous, you just want to play splitting hairs games where you will claim victory if I cannot find 'evidence' online that only 1% , and exactly 1%, of gays are monogamous. 

No, it could be true or it could not be, I don't know. Since I'm not fucking retarded I'm going to base my judgment on evidence once I have it.

[starvingniglet]

"As soon as you have to present evidence you've lost the argument"
lol

As soon as I present evidence you will resort to attacking the validity of the evidence.  I know how arguing works, and I really don't feel like sparring with you over the subject of why faggotry is wrong.  It will go nowhere because the best minds in the world have not solved the problem of rampant faggotry, so how are we going to here in a forum?

[Lanny]

As soon as I present evidence you will resort to attacking the validity of the evidence.  I know how arguing works, and I really don't feel like sparring with you over the subject of why faggotry is wrong.

"I'm afraid my evidence is so shitty that it'll trivially knocked over". If your evidence is invalid then of course I'm going to point that out. If it isn't then fine, I'll accept it. You're so afraid you might be wrong you won't even try, that's the only example of degeneracy here.

[starvingniglet]

You are one disturbed individual, you know that?