Gay bashing

[Lanny]

right, because you're already far worse

[starvingniglet]

How am I far worse?  I am a monogamous heterosexual, so I am already far more human than two legged beasts who use their genitals in all sorts of hedonistic, impulsive ways.  Most faggots cannot even stay faithful to one partner, they cannot control their own sexual impulses, so they are animals, not people.

[Lanny]

How am I far worse?

Well you're a fucking idiot for one.

[starvingniglet]

Well you're a fucking idiot for one.

go on.....

[Lanny]

Well, in addition to being an idiot you don't seem to realize that disqualifies you from feeling superior to people who aren't hurting anyone against their will. Like if you were just dumb and realized that, that's OK I guess, but you go from being an idiot to moralizing on the basis of being an idiot

[starvingniglet]

Well, in addition to being an idiot you don't seem to realize that disqualifies you from feeling superior to people who aren't hurting anyone against their will. Like if you were just dumb and realized that, that's OK I guess, but you go from being an idiot to moralizing on the basis of being an idiot

I am not saying I am superior to anyone.  Not even animals, which is what faggots basically are.

[Lanny]

Seeing as you've admitted to recreational drug use, you're on the same level.

I will never be on the same level as faggots who dip their genitals into other males' cloaca

[starvingniglet]

Seeing as you've admitted to recreational drug use, you're on the same level.

I will never be on the same level as faggots who dip their genitals into other males' cloaca

Just because defiling oneself and others when one should be civilized enough to know better is on a different 'level' than recreational drug use, does not in any way imply 'superiority'.  Culpability in acts of perversion and taboo practices is another story.

[RisiR]

I'm pro gay.

[starvingniglet]

I'm pro gay.

I really honestly do not give a fuck what people do, but I know that faggotry is wrong.  Now, lesbians, that is another story. 

 

[equanimity]

I'm pro gay.

I really honestly do not give a fuck what people do, but I know that faggotry is wrong.  Now, lesbians, that is another story. 

 

Are you being serious?  Why would one be okay, but not the other?

[RisiR]

Imagine the tip of a penis touching your upper lip and a single drop of pre-cum flows into your mouth all the way to the back and makes you gag a little bit.

[starvingniglet]

Are you being serious?  Why would one be okay, but not the other?

Just because I am sexually aroused by women entwined in wet lust and exploring each others bodies, does not mean that I will ever get a chance to express my 'sexual preference' in real life (well, I could hire some prostitutes).  I can control my sexual urges, and when I am in a relationship, I am monogamous.  I may like lesbians, but I do not go out and hire whores to express my 'sexual identity'. 

And yes, I am very much implying that faggots are incapable of being monogamous.  Show me a monogamous faggot, and I will show you a pair of AIDS patients that hooked up because they are both immune.

They are also incapable of controlling their sexual urges...just because one is 'gay' does not mean one has to go out and act on their 'sexual preference'. 

[Lanny]

Are you being serious?  Why would one be okay, but not the other?

Just because I am sexually aroused by women entwined in wet lust and exploring each others bodies, does not mean that I will ever get a chance to express my 'sexual preference' in real life (well, I could hire some prostitutes).  I can control my sexual urges, and when I am in a relationship, I am monogamous.  I may like lesbians, but I do not go out and hire whores to express my 'sexual identity'. 

And yes, I am very much implying that faggots are incapable of being monogamous.  Show me a monogamous faggot, and I will show you a pair of AIDS patients that hooked up because they are both immune.

While obviously false that homosexuals can't have monogamous relationships, it's unclear how being in a non-monogamous relationship is indicative of a lack of impulse control. Consider this study:

http://ftfhalland.se/filer/MongamyArticlePublished.pdf

That not only finds monogamous and faithful gay couples exist, but also that there's no evidence that open gay relationships are damaged by non-monogamy.

They are also incapable of controlling their sexual urges...just because one is 'gay' does not mean one has to go out and act on their 'sexual preference'. 

Just because you're straight doesn't mean you have to go out and act on it, and yet you do and presumably you don't expect to be criticized for it.

[equanimity]

Are you being serious?  Why would one be okay, but not the other?

Just because I am sexually aroused by women entwined in wet lust and exploring each others bodies, does not mean that I will ever get a chance to express my 'sexual preference' in real life (well, I could hire some prostitutes).  I can control my sexual urges, and when I am in a relationship, I am monogamous.  I may like lesbians, but I do not go out and hire whores to express my 'sexual identity'. 

And yes, I am very much implying that faggots are incapable of being monogamous.  Show me a monogamous faggot, and I will show you a pair of AIDS patients that hooked up because they are both immune.

They are also incapable of controlling their sexual urges...just because one is 'gay' does not mean one has to go out and act on their 'sexual preference'. 

"Liking lesbians" can't really be compared to exclusively being attracted to one sex over the other.  And you still never reconciled your double standard.  If it's wrong for men to have sex with each other, wouldn't lesbianism be wrong too?  I guess maybe you're saying that it's wrong because they're incapable of monogamy, but that's an unfounded (and untrue) generalization.

But yeah you're totally getting fetish and sexual preference confused.