Poll

Should a new site be created by Idio?

No, keep only Sanctuary
21 (38.2%)
Yes, keep only new site (totse3?)
23 (41.8%)
Yes, keep both Sanctuary and new site (totse3?)
11 (20%)

Total Members Voted: 55

Author Topic: Should a new site be created by Idio?  (Read 12414 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Idiosyncrasy

  • Arch Disciple
  • ***
  • Posts: 617
    • View Profile
    • Raw Data for Raw Nerves
Should a new site be created by Idio?
« on: November 20, 2014, 08:44:38 pm »
Dear Folks,

Before I begin, please note that this is not an advertisement.  Arnox, the staff, and I have been having some discussions, and I would like to get some input from you all.  I have been thinking about starting a new site.  A totse3, of sorts.  That is my suggestion.

Some of this stemmed from posts of sentiments from our admin being open to an additional community1.  I also noticed some support from a few of you2, which helped propel my decision. 

Although Arnox has offered to let me take over The Sanctuary3, a trust for which I am very thankful, I think it would best good to have a new site, a new chance, and a rebirth of a new beginning.  Arnox has done a great job in creating The Sanctuary, and he has put up with a lot of crap.  This move, if it were to happen, might displace a few people, but I feel that it is a chance to gain back many who have been lost.  We lost at least 90% of the totse2 userbase since it went down in October 2013.  The darkbb replacement was not good, though it was up until May 2014.  We seem to have lost a lot of the Zoklet refugees too.

In case you are wondering what I would do differently, I have scratched up a few points.  Of course I would be open to what you all thought, and some things would need to be done differently than before.
  • We would be using vBulletin.  With vBulletin, we would have content management. That means text-files, blogs, and possibly other add-ons.
  • Less over-moderating, and the rules would be a little different.  The over-modding part comes down to the banning.  There has been a lot of it lately, and there wouldn't necessarily be as much banning.
  • HB would be for whatever, as long as not CP or illegal stuff and it fit the site rules, and SG would be more serious discussion that doesn't fall in other forums. Other forums would be for serious discussion.
  • NIMF would remain NIMF. It's for things that don't belong. Threads would not be created there.
  • We would have more section mods, and less global mods. I would have to make sure we don't have too many mods for the needs.  It does sound conflicting to say less over-modding and more section mods, but here is my thinking.  With section mods on totse2, I basically told each mod to run their sections how they want, within the scope of the site rules and the description of the section.  We always say at work, "run it like you own it."  I laid out the site rules, and then allowed them to create their individual forum rules and sticky them.  If I didn't agree with a rule, then we would discuss it, but they ran the forum.  When people started doing things wrong or abusing their authority, they were de-modded.  It created a sense of ownership and accountability.
    Most section mods just moved things around and kept things tidy, rather than banning and infracting.  After all, we want our users to come here and enjoy themselves, not worry about being kicked off the site.  With a different userbase, we might have to make some adjustments, but that's my general thinking.

Some of you may be put off by the name totse3.  I like it because we are basically emulating totse, and totse2 went down, so the name makes sense to me, but I'm not married to it.  Please vote on whether or not it would be good to have a new site.  If the name is lame, please suggest a new one.

The most important thing about any website like this is its community.  So this wouldn't be my site.  It would be our site.

Footnotes
1:
Spoiler
If you guys feel you can make a better place for the community, that's actually fine and, believe it or not, I encourage it. It would in reality be nice to not have to admin and have to be the guy nobody likes.
Actually, believe it or not, I would approve if someone made another totse-like website which passes my inspection and the admin there is actually a good one and further, if the admin actually ASKED before he started advertising on my site. I would even be willing to resign and maybe even give control of this site over to them.
You want 'em? I'll give 'em to you for a bargain deal. And then you can be the one people will call faggot and curse because you may have moved their precious thread over to another sub-forum. Then again, I don't think I'd wish this fate upon my worst enemy.
2:
Spoiler
Idio, if you would like to admin, you need only say. I'll give the site to you right now. It's yours if you want it.
Take the site Idio, it literally IS the only chance this community has. Until its taken from that incompetent fuckhead's hands, things will only get worse, more people will leave, the place with continue to be more irrelevant and pointless.
Come on Idio, do it for your country, do it for your people and do it...
For the memory of Zoklet and all who have been banned, arrested and made threads on how to make drugs!
Take it Idio', because I think you know the long term consequences for this site if you don't.
If it's only slight hesitation then fucking go for it. What's the worst that could happen? Getting made fun of by a bunch of low-lives on an internet forum?
So since both Arnox and Idio stopped posting entirely after this exchange, does this mean there is some....dare I say......Hope?

Is there discussion/negotiation going on behind the scenes?
Give us an update guys, inquiring minds want to know.....
Idio, I've been watching the comments of you and all the other mods very closely for several weeks in regard to a lot of the forum drama/policies....and I notice you especially choose your words very carefully so as not to upset the applecart.  And being one of the more rational/mature people around here, you HAVE to realize there are a few obvious and quick things you could do to bring back some credibility back to these boards......but you aren't talking about it publicly since you are trying to remain loyal to Arnox.

If you think the ship is going down any how, why not at least try to take over the wheel and right things......instead of just going down into the murky depths of the ocean?
1. take over
2. demod zek
3. ???
4. profit
idio, if you start totse3, I'm with you...
Well, I want my totse2 back but we can't have everything.
3:
Spoiler
Idio, if you would like to admin, you need only say. I'll give the site to you right now. It's yours if you want it.

Offline Obvious Alt

  • Devotee
  • **
  • Posts: 177
    • View Profile
Re: Should a new site be created by Idio?
« Reply #1 on: November 20, 2014, 08:48:45 pm »
No.
The staff are like kids running around with jars trying to catch lightning bugs, but they don't realize that the bugs are really wasps...really big wasps, and they aren't lightning bugs at all, they are just carrying flaming torches.  Hilarity will soon ensue.

Offline Obvious Alt

  • Devotee
  • **
  • Posts: 177
    • View Profile
Re: Should a new site be created by Idio?
« Reply #2 on: November 20, 2014, 08:53:09 pm »
Everyone and their mothers create new sites.

Goatwhore and UM are doing something. Fanglekai and Spectre, too. LLZ and helladamnjew's site. The IRC and whatever # channels....

Well, y'know what. Go for it. :tup:
The staff are like kids running around with jars trying to catch lightning bugs, but they don't realize that the bugs are really wasps...really big wasps, and they aren't lightning bugs at all, they are just carrying flaming torches.  Hilarity will soon ensue.

Offline -SpectraL

  • Commandant
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,605
  • Sinking kidiots since 1989
    • View Profile
Re: Should a new site be created by Idio?
« Reply #3 on: November 20, 2014, 08:53:26 pm »

Why are users getting banned for a week for advertising alternate sites and yet the staff here can freely advertise their own? Seems hypocritical to me.

Offline Idiosyncrasy

  • Arch Disciple
  • ***
  • Posts: 617
    • View Profile
    • Raw Data for Raw Nerves
Re: Should a new site be created by Idio?
« Reply #4 on: November 20, 2014, 08:54:37 pm »

Why are users getting banned for a week for advertising alternate sites and yet the staff here can freely advertise their own? Seems hypocritical to me.

It's just a suggestion.  I don't even have a site, so I don't know how I could be advertising something I don't have.

Offline Obvious Alt

  • Devotee
  • **
  • Posts: 177
    • View Profile
Re: Should a new site be created by Idio?
« Reply #5 on: November 20, 2014, 08:59:25 pm »
Just get rid of Arnox and demod Zek.

Problems solved. Fresh start 3.0 part 2.
The staff are like kids running around with jars trying to catch lightning bugs, but they don't realize that the bugs are really wasps...really big wasps, and they aren't lightning bugs at all, they are just carrying flaming torches.  Hilarity will soon ensue.

Offline mashleshmash

  • Zealot
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,391
    • View Profile
Re: Should a new site be created by Idio?
« Reply #6 on: November 20, 2014, 09:02:23 pm »
Please no.
unwyred: have you sucked dick for heroin?

 apric0t: maybe i tried and didnt like it

Offline -SpectraL

  • Commandant
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,605
  • Sinking kidiots since 1989
    • View Profile
Re: Should a new site be created by Idio?
« Reply #7 on: November 20, 2014, 09:06:38 pm »

Why are users getting banned for a week for advertising alternate sites and yet the staff here can freely advertise their own? Seems hypocritical to me.



It's just a suggestion.  I don't even have a site, so I don't know how I could be advertising something I don't have.
There's no difference in advertising a site which may be and a site which already exists. Reverse the bogus bans.

Offline Idiosyncrasy

  • Arch Disciple
  • ***
  • Posts: 617
    • View Profile
    • Raw Data for Raw Nerves
Re: Should a new site be created by Idio?
« Reply #8 on: November 20, 2014, 09:18:59 pm »
There's no difference in advertising a site which may be and a site which already exists. Reverse the bogus bans.

Since it bothers you, the advertising policy of The Sanctuary is as follows:

Advertising on here is NOT ALLOWED. My site is not a place to hawk your wares. I'm going to change the rule a little bit temporarily to say that all requests to advertise must now go through me. No exceptions. So I can better keep track of what the heck's going on and who said what.

If you guys feel you can make a better place for the community, that's actually fine and, believe it or not, I encourage it. It would in reality be nice to not have to admin and have to be the guy nobody likes. To pass the responsibility on to someone I can trust. HOWEVER, I will NOT support any shoddily built and/or run websites. If I pass the torch, I want to make sure that it's actually in good hands. This is the way it is now. I'm sorry if you don't like it.

Below is a snippet of a conversation we had:

So, I guess I'll just put this out there.  I'm thinking about starting a new site.  I thought about a totse3.com of sorts, but people are kind of turned off to the totse name it seems.  Arnox, would you support this?  I'm still working out a lot of the details.

Well, I would if you're deadset on it but I don't think it's a good idea. Why do you feel we need another site?


Offline Spectre

  • Arch Disciple
  • ***
  • Posts: 606
    • View Profile
Re: Should a new site be created by Idio?
« Reply #9 on: November 20, 2014, 09:26:57 pm »
Everyone and their mothers create new sites.

Goatwhore and UM are doing something. Fanglekai and Spectre, too. LLZ and helladamnjew's site. The IRC and whatever # channels....

Well, y'know what. Go for it. :tup:

Fang and I are just holding that till a replacement is up

I would back and help idio 100%

Offline mizled

  • Devotee
  • **
  • Posts: 198
  • Sharia Lawless
    • View Profile
    • last day of totse
Re: Should a new site be created by Idio?
« Reply #10 on: November 20, 2014, 09:29:58 pm »
&t3 - sounds good to me.
Self loathing is the fate of all great iconoclasts -

Offline Obvious Alt

  • Devotee
  • **
  • Posts: 177
    • View Profile
Re: Should a new site be created by Idio?
« Reply #11 on: November 20, 2014, 09:30:37 pm »
Something tells me this would turn out even worse than this shithole. I dunno.
The staff are like kids running around with jars trying to catch lightning bugs, but they don't realize that the bugs are really wasps...really big wasps, and they aren't lightning bugs at all, they are just carrying flaming torches.  Hilarity will soon ensue.

Offline Obvious Alt

  • Devotee
  • **
  • Posts: 177
    • View Profile
Re: Should a new site be created by Idio?
« Reply #12 on: November 20, 2014, 09:31:46 pm »
I've voted "yes, keep only new site", though.
The staff are like kids running around with jars trying to catch lightning bugs, but they don't realize that the bugs are really wasps...really big wasps, and they aren't lightning bugs at all, they are just carrying flaming torches.  Hilarity will soon ensue.

Offline -SpectraL

  • Commandant
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,605
  • Sinking kidiots since 1989
    • View Profile
Re: Should a new site be created by Idio?
« Reply #13 on: November 20, 2014, 09:32:17 pm »

It's absolutely ridiculous to start another site when you have one right here already setup. And there's nothing wrong with Arnox's abilities or dedication, it's just that he's made all the wrong decisions.

Offline Obvious Alt

  • Devotee
  • **
  • Posts: 177
    • View Profile
Re: Should a new site be created by Idio?
« Reply #14 on: November 20, 2014, 09:34:27 pm »
Quote
And there's nothing wrong with Arnox's abilities
Well, he's got Autism...
The staff are like kids running around with jars trying to catch lightning bugs, but they don't realize that the bugs are really wasps...really big wasps, and they aren't lightning bugs at all, they are just carrying flaming torches.  Hilarity will soon ensue.