Help me do my gf's homework

[Infinityshock]

Morality is an integral part of the societal chain, without which humanity would be reduced to the level of the common ape.

false

also...if this chick wants free academic assistance shes going to need to reciprocate. the base minimum is going to be full frontal nudes posted.  if its a decent grade she better be prepared to loan out some of her orifices in appreciation

[Σ]

No contribution no pics.

Try harder next time faggot.

Also it would improve your post quality if you wrote more than false. Why do you take that statement as false?

[Infinityshock]

no worries...i have enough of her to provide my fapping needs for months

im not here to provide quality posts.  because morality is based on a societal outlook that varies as broadly as the number of societies themselves.  it is accepted but not practiced.  adultery...murder...theft...corruption...rape...ad nauseum

[fanglekai]

Morality is an integral part of the societal chain, without which humanity would be reduced to the level of the common ape.

false

also...if this chick wants free academic assistance shes going to need to reciprocate. the base minimum is going to be full frontal nudes posted.  if its a decent grade she better be prepared to loan out some of her orifices in appreciation

I agree

[Lanny]

Is your girlfriend in highschool or something? This is one weak sauce topic. Here's how you should write it

Intro:
Some mariam-webster bullshit, distinction between law and morality, normative force, is and ought, all that jazz that no one in ethics really cares about

Para 1:
Utilitarianism alone doesn't provide a framework for justice
Under extreme circumstances utilitarianism could condone genocide if a sufficient large group of people would be made sufficiently happy by it
Benthamite utilitarianism requires that we choose the life of a satisfied immortal pig over any mortal human life because the pleasures of pigs are of an essentially same kind as the pleasures of humans
Mill's utilitarianism would require us to choose any amount of human suffering over any amount of pleasure available to lower animals

Para 2:
Relativism doesn't suffer from utilitarianism's intolerance
uhh, some people kinda like relativism sometimes I guess?
If we adopt some wonky meta-ethical framework it possibly isn't internally inconsistent?

All those points are lies, but they'll make a philosophy teacher happy.