Off-Topic Posting

[-SpectraL]

How deep constitutes enough posts for me to make an objective statement about your post quality?

How deep? To the bottom of the hole, kid. Laziness is no excuse for thoroughness. If you're gonna open your yap, you should be able to back it up with ALL the facts, not just your cherry-picked "facts". Get reading.

[Michael Myers]

What's itching my butthole?

[-SpectraL]

Here's another one, just in case you're having eyesight problems, which you should most probably get checked at the optometrist as soon as possible...

http://www.intosanctuary.com/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=228

[zok jr.]

Spectral doesn't contribute everyone knows that lol.

[-SpectraL]

Spectral doesn't contribute everyone knows that lol.

You used to be a heavy kidiot spammer as well. I guess I'd have to painfully concede that you've kind of grown up over the years. I still see traces of the old zok jr., but it's not so lame now as to be excruciatingly pathetic as it was in the past. Good work, kid. Some day you might just be someone to contend with.

[Michael Myers]

As well? So you're saying you were one too?

[-SpectraL]

As well? So you're saying you were one too?

No. I'm saying you're the third example in addition to the two examples I already posted. Try to follow the plot, son. There will be a test at the end of the presentation, and it doesn't involve midgets and helium balloons.

[starvingniglet]

This.  On most forums I've posted on, moderators wouldn't delete off-topic posts but would move them into an appropriate thread, or a "trashcan" thread if required. Leaving off-topic posts detracts from the discussion.

Off topic posts are only a problem if you read  and type slow.  I read fast enough where I can just skim over anything off topic and move on to the next one.  I feel sorry for you that you read slowly, and the off topic posts present such an obstacle to your forum experience that you have to get staff to come clear the debris out of the way for you.  We need a forum for people like you, sort of a 'special olympics' of 'quality posts'.

[-SpectraL]

Bring on the duck and dives!

[starvingniglet]

Bring on the duck and dives!

you mean the shuck and jives

[Michael Myers]

As well? So you're saying you were one too?

No. I'm saying you're the third example in addition to the two examples I already posted. Try to follow the plot, son. There will be a test at the end of the presentation, and it doesn't involve midgets and helium balloons.

Off topic!

[-SpectraL]

What we need is a book of excuses which anyone can simply draw from when the feeling hits. It could have a Table of Contents, an Index, even a prologue and special section at the end for credits, contributions and commendations. We could label the sections by a number/letter arrangement. ie: 1a, 1b, 1c, 2a, 2b, 2c, and even add excuse sub-sections, such as 1b article 7. That way, any time someone needs a convenient duck and dive, or wishes to cite a duck and dive, they can simply refer to the section/sub-section/article. ie: please refer to Duck and Dive 73m article 109, paragraph 13, etc, etc, etc...

[Jedi Moped]

What we need is a book of excuses which anyone can simply draw from when the feeling hits. It could have a Table of Contents, an Index, even a prologue and special section at the end for credits, contributions and commendations. We could label the sections by a number/letter arrangement. ie: 1a, 1b, 1c, 2a, 2b, 2c, and even add excuse sub-sections, such as 1b article 7. That way, any time someone needs a convenient duck and dive, or wishes to cite a duck and dive, they can simply refer to the section/sub-section/article. ie: please refer to Duck and Dive 73m article 109, paragraph 13, etc, etc, etc...

Thats the way you have always operated. So why not just share the manual you wrote?

[constantinople]

Here's another one, just in case you're having eyesight problems, which you should most probably get checked at the optometrist as soon as possible...

http://www.intosanctuary.com/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=228

Are you trying to say that one members non-contribution excuses your own?

[-SpectraL]

What we need is a book of excuses which anyone can simply draw from when the feeling hits. It could have a Table of Contents, an Index, even a prologue and special section at the end for credits, contributions and commendations. We could label the sections by a number/letter arrangement. ie: 1a, 1b, 1c, 2a, 2b, 2c, and even add excuse sub-sections, such as 1b article 7. That way, any time someone needs a convenient duck and dive, or wishes to cite a duck and dive, they can simply refer to the section/sub-section/article. ie: please refer to Duck and Dive 73m article 109, paragraph 13, etc, etc, etc...

Thats the way you have always operated. So why not just share the manual you wrote?

You again!??

*pulls out drawing board*