Author Topic: Shake n Bake Recipie #100 - My Detailed Contribution by Li Part 1 of 2  (Read 45923 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline VenomStallone

  • Outlander
  • *
  • Posts: 18
  • BLTCC
    • View Profile
Re: Shake n Bake Recipie #100 - My Detailed Contribution by Li Part 1 of 2
« Reply #60 on: November 24, 2014, 08:11:45 pm »
The vespiary?
« Last Edit: November 29, 2014, 04:23:25 am by VenomStallone »

Offline DeJaVu

  • Adherent
  • *
  • Posts: 20
    • View Profile
Re: Shake n Bake Recipie #100 - My Detailed Contribution by Li Part 1 of 2
« Reply #61 on: November 24, 2014, 09:26:55 pm »
Venom,

There's a lot in those notes that I found that I want to pass onto you and any others that may find it as interesting as I have...

First, the simple answer without supporting explaination...based on what I have read, I can PROMISE you that the Transition to a Metallic State (TMS) is not the issue, or any issue at all. Keep a bucket of cold water handy... When you have produced a significant portion of the brackish flakes, let pressure build to near your venting threshold and then cool the reaction by setting the bottle in the cold water... This will slow the reaction, reduce the pressure, and cause all those flakes to surface, and get skinny, and stick together, and create shiny bbs and puddles of golden mercury... And fuel will clear as all the Li(NH3)4 clears out of the fuel.

Explaination.... I am typing on a phone at the moment, and have no access to the notes that I transposed, but this evening I will try to locate an amazing research report regarding TMS that really gives a lot more understanding of the physics of this reaction... Off the top of my head I will explain a little the best that I can as it relates to transition shifts that you are explaining...

First of all, it's relatively easy to manipulate the Li(NH3)4 phases from the brackish flakes to the copper bbs to to golden mercury and vice versa (I honestly don't understand a lot of it, and I'm ok admitting that as the leading physicists in the field don't fully understand it at this point), but the factors that are being balanced to maintain the small window of the actual TMS are pressure, temperatue, and saturation of free electrons... It's pretty amazing to see when you know what to watch for (at least from what I read)... The lightly saturated solution will cause a clear fuel to take on a faint blue tint caused by the energy of the traveling free electrons...(the faint color is actually the tail end of the elections...like a comet...crossing into the visible plain.. Shit outta time 4 now... I'll try to pass more on with references soon...

Offline PurpleCow

  • Adherent
  • *
  • Posts: 96
    • View Profile
Re: Shake n Bake Recipie #100 - My Detailed Contribution by Li Part 1 of 2
« Reply #62 on: November 24, 2014, 11:23:08 pm »
Yes Deja, 2 runs would be ideal. But as for an extraction, resources are slim and a tek for said extraction is beyond grasp unless you can hunt one up. I know there was one on  t0t$3ttwo before it got raided.  The Straight to Bee i believe? But thats old shit that probably wouldnt work on todays gaks.

Anyone got a workaround or shall they try the microwave?

  The following is Wareami's LT Method 

This is purely solvent separation of an hcl salt, not acid/base extraction.

The mechanics of this process were never given much air play.

The same principals and processes, in theory, have been outlined in other extraction techiques deployed and offered up by Ibee in the past.

First thing to consider.
With all solvent based extractions, smelly solvents are used. Those solvents need to evaporate and the material dried to recover the goods.
Never attempt these types of extractions/separations without adequate and proper ventilation. If doing these extractions in a garage or shed, always have some side projects going like painting or furniture refinishing....
Ibee's living conditions once required him to complete an LT extraction outdoors. 3 different times. Alcohol and substance free Half-Way houses frown on their residents cooking drugs :blackeye:
Anyhow...the smell of the evaporating LT leaves alot to be desired. That is the only drawback reported by most who have used this method.

Next...The process by which these solvents either release or activate certain components used to comprise the pills depends heavily on being able to contact those individual components/gaaks/binders etc.
Ibee found the most effective way to expose every last molecule to the treatments/solvents applied, is by making certain that all the pills are finely crushed and every grain powdered.
Many use coffee grinders for expediency sake...plus when working with large amounts as most will, it's a pain in the arse paying that much attention to the process.
Ibee would use a coffee grinder, but would never stop there if he wanted his yields and quality to be the highest degree achievable.
Mortar and Pestal powdering would follow the preliminary mass grinding.

Next...The process by which the Prewash come in contact with the pillmass(PM) is equally important.
The time exposed to this solvent prewash cocktail does matter.
You all should know from past reports by Ibee, that the tetra works by exciting the polymers causing them to be more attracted or distracted by the solvent which causes them to loose their grip on the pfed...for a time. There is a stage after time that the polymers will rebind with the pfed after losing their affinity for swimming freely. Ibee sat and watched this occur believe it or not.
The activity level of the PM in the Prewash subsides after time. Don't let the PM soak in the juice longer than it takes to get your filterfunnel ready. One minute to two minutes at the most.
So...the object here is to put the finely powdered PM into a bowl or small glass, then after thoroughly mixing the Prewash Juice in a separate flask,(swirling is not enough...the two different viscosity levels of tetra and LT will keep them separated as two layers until physically stirred.) Add this juice to the PM and stir everything thoroughly. The tendency of the PM will be to float on top and clump together some. Break it up making sure every granule is contacted by the juice.
Then pour everything into the prepared SINGLE COFFEE FILTERED funnel catching the now gaaked juice into another jar.
The reason for using one single filter is the porosity of just one filter alllows for the escape of the now liquified gaaks that have lost their grip on the Pfed.
Spray down the bowl sides with tetra with the spraytube provided if using tetra from brakeparts or electrical parts cleaners to get all the PM into the filter.
This excess tetra also acts to help wash the PM before proceeding.

The egull method used tetra alone to accomplish this step. pfed is completely insoluble in tetra so one could easily pour the PM onto cardboard or paper to speed up the drying process.
This cannot be done that way with LT/Tetra treated PM becuase the polar solvents have made the pfed readily soluable with anything it comes in contact with when wet. Hence, the pfed will stick to and be absorbed by paper or other porous material.
So don't handle the filter cake too much....just ball up the filter and squeeze out the excess juice. Take the filter unfold and pour the PM onto a pyrexplate to dry. Dry the filterpaper as well as some of the PM will be stuck to it and can be removed and added to the other recovered PM after drying. Just scrunch up the filter paper when dry over top of the pyrexplate and the powder will fall off.
Now that you have the dried PM collected in the pyrex dish, this next part deserves some explaination about volume, solvation, and surface area.

Simply put, we have a solid substance we are trying to separate from a whole host of other solid substances. All have varying degrees of weight and solubility factors. Some are water soluable, others won't disolve unless they come in contact with the solvent they were created with. For the most part however, many of the substances used to make the pills are soluble in the same solvents that pfed is soluble in.
The trick is in keeping the rest of the substances that were designed to ride with the pfed, from riding with pfed.
Enter the Lacquer Thinner!
What makes LT a superior solvent to alcohol and water extractions
Alcohol extractions were defeated mainly because most of these gaaks/binders/polymers will dissolve right along with the pfed and therefore be present in the evapped result. If the polymer was included to prevent extraction, then it's "Game On" in trying to find ways of circumventing their purpose!
Dreamers and Bees rely heavily on being able to extract the goodz in as pristeen clean a state as possible and it had become the pharmers jobs to prevent this.

Okay...now comes a crucial mechanical part.
This involves the step that takes the most time and patience in this process. It involves not only the extraction of pfed but most critical is the equipment used and the process followed to a tee for best results.
The settling period, or waiting until the LT/Pfed solution above the PM solids becomes clear.
Half-assing this wait, or pulling when cloudy is sure to provide unsatisfactory yields as well as reduced quality and the result will be gaaked. Not "May be" Will be.
Ibee always strives for pristeen clean feed in the highest yield achievable and with patience and due diligence, gets it or considers the method not worthy.
With todays higher price of all materials used as well as feedstock being in shorter supply, one can't cut corners if they want to get the most bang for the buck.


The reason tall jars work most effectively compared to shorter squat jars is the surface area and the settling factors of the various weight gaaks/binders are affected by the volume of solvent used.
Many hidden factors exist in why this method is able to keep the gaaks with the same solubility as pfed from moving up into the solute layer.
Ibee won't pretend to know every angle, but the various options have been experimented with over time and settled on what works best. He can only outline what he believes is going on and why
Here is an image of the two vessel shapes to give some better idea of what we're dealing with!

The liquid/solid issue is a biggie when one factors in gravity of the various weight substances.
The further a substance needs to travel to reach what it wants to occupy, the harder it is to occupy that space. Couple that fact with substances of like solubility competing for space, and the one that gets there first will most likely be dissolved. In a flat round container...that distance is minimal surface wise and the liquid is more spread out. Eventually some of that unwanted gaak substance will gravitate and be dissolved into the liquid.
In the taller cylindrical shaped vessel, the pfed will dissolve as will the other gaaks but after settling, the pfed stays dissolved while the other heavier gaaks sink back to the bottom.
Ibee has pulled gaaks when using short squat vessels.

So if it takes 4 hours for the first pull to clear....you wait 4 hours on that pull.
The next pulls off the same PM will clear in less time.
Ibee has used 2 jars and splits the PM between them and extracts separately sometimes. This shortens the wait time on clearing and it also expedites the time it takes to all the pfed.

So....WAITING UNTIL CLEAR is critical...so is the size and shape of the jar/vessel used to extract with LT.

Now onto the next process of critical importance.
After clearing, this LT/Pfed solution needs to be PULLED off the top being careful not to stir up the gaaks that will get kicked up into the solvent containing the pfed if disturbed.
The last thing you want to do after waiting that long time for things to clear, is to make it cloudy again accidently. Decanting or pouring off will disturb the PM sediment.
Ibee uses a modified eyeclearing solution bottle he adapted with a tube.
Here is a pic of a makeshift syphoner/puller:

Ibee's tried using basters and other modified mass liquid pullers and all failed because of the airflow or leaks and other anomolies introduced that don't have the control needed to keep the liquid from dripping back down and disturbing the PM sediment.

Pull the LT/Pfed liquid off, and put through fine filtration device postioned over a pyrex pie plate, collecting to evap.
Do each pull separately....one plate per pull if doing multiple jars at once.
Too much liquid evapping at once will take forever to evap.
Ibee has used a hotplate on the lowest temp setting to expedite this process, but again, the smell of LT is hideos!

A suitable fine filtering gravity fed filter device can be made thusly using a funnel, cottonballs, and coffee filters.

Be sure to clamp this funnel upright, securely, and make sure the bottom of the stem is not more than 1-3 inches(2.54-7.62 cm) above the evap collection dish or goodz will splash out as it drips.
Prewet the filters with LT before adding the LT/Pfed.
And be sure to test the funnel first if it's plastic to make sure the LT won't dissolve the plastic. Ibee likes the metal funnels for this process.


There ya have it....Evap the LT/Pfed in each evapdish and SWIM should be left with sparkling white fiberglass-type looking needles of pfed.
One could dissolve these in alcohol and the resulting evapped pfed will be pinwheel shaped pfed xtals.
If even the slightest amount of discoloration is seen in these xtals, wash with MEK asnd the result should be sparkling white pristeenclean feedstock.

As you can tell by the length of this post...there is alot to be considered about extraction and Ibee didn't even elaborate on every single aspect of this process.
Start to finish, one should have their feedstock in about 2-6 hours depending on how much gaak is involved and depending on how long it takes the solution to clear before pulling.

Hope this helps.
« Last Edit: November 25, 2014, 03:47:12 am by PurpleCow »
Where's Edify?

Offline ChronicBoom!

  • Adherent
  • *
  • Posts: 31
    • View Profile
Re: Shake n Bake Recipie #100 - My Detailed Contribution by Li Part 1 of 2d
« Reply #63 on: November 25, 2014, 04:04:09 am »
Does the acetone remove the lithium contaminants ? Recent first hand experience why too much lithium can be so awful. I have been thinking feds were after me n a lot of things like that and actually seeing people outside and have in my case realized it was most definitely the lithium. There will most definitely be good watching of the lithiums reaction and good washing going on.
Signature

Offline VenomStallone

  • Outlander
  • *
  • Posts: 18
  • BLTCC
    • View Profile
Re: Shake n Bake Recipie #100 - My Detailed Contribution by Li Part 1 of 2
« Reply #64 on: November 25, 2014, 04:53:51 am »
Dejavu:
;) I remember the first discussion of Lithiums TMS on T0ts3two.... Some guy posted some articles about it. Not too long after that the damn site went down! None the less share away, In PM of course.

Purplecow:
Thank you for the information. Reading through it right now.


Offline DeJaVu

  • Adherent
  • *
  • Posts: 20
    • View Profile
Re: Shake n Bake Recipie #100 - My Detailed Contribution by Li Part 1 of 2
« Reply #65 on: November 25, 2014, 11:48:38 am »
Rather than trying to type out a thesis on this, that I guarantee i'll fuck up the explanation on as I don't have the chemistry/physics background to truly understand it all, I will pm you a pdf, or a link to it, that will give you all the info that you will ever need... This article is a fucking goldmine imo.

Then, I'll just follow it up with an explanation oh how this information has apparently been observed and applied in real practicle experience, according to the notes that I found...

Offline DeJaVu

  • Adherent
  • *
  • Posts: 20
    • View Profile
Re: Shake n Bake Recipie #100 - My Detailed Contribution by Li Part 1 of 2
« Reply #66 on: November 25, 2014, 01:06:16 pm »
Purple,

Another great reference and procedure...

I want to point out that a procedure like that would be well worth performing so that a gup chucked vs. Extracted pfed experiment could be properly performed and definitive results could be achieved...

With that said,, this process of extracting pse would not be practicle for the tek outlined in this forum... The average expected yields of the tek are about 1.5 - 3g of product for each bake... The quantity simply doesn't justify the cost/effort/time/smell associated with the extraction...

I think it's important to remember that this tek CAN produce "BANG ASS DOPE"... But the TRUE goal and advantages of this tek is to produce very respectively GOOD product quickly, easily, and cheaply...

With that in mind, this is just a personal idea/theory that could be tried...

I know that in the old "Annie" dayz, some enthusiasts would would use sodium hydroxide and ammonium nitrate in non polar to generate ammonia gas... Then they would just though the gup chucked pill mass in, give the psed time to base, and then either use the "extracted" pse in base form or perform an a/b extraction and use the pse hcl for their actual cook.

If one were to do say:

Soak the pse pill mass in np for a 6 hours prior to getting started, then siphon off and discard the "wash fuel" containing the non polar soluble impurities from the pill mass.

Dry and 're-crush the pill mass and the through it in a shake bottle with some np, lye, and an for maybe 30-45 min shaking it around now and then to get all of the pse to base.

Filter off and perform a/b on the fuel to retrieve "extracted" pse hcl crystals for use in actual cook...

Obviuosly this would not be as pure as the tek that you posted, but my thoughts are that it should be pretty damn good...and even though it's a pain in the ass compared to simply gup chucking, it requires no new materials and no New process for the baker to learn.

Thoughts?
« Last Edit: November 25, 2014, 01:09:34 pm by DeJaVu »

Offline DeJaVu

  • Adherent
  • *
  • Posts: 20
    • View Profile
Re: Shake n Bake Recipie #100 - My Detailed Contribution by Li Part 1 of 2
« Reply #67 on: November 25, 2014, 02:11:20 pm »
Venom,

Can you let me know if you received my pm when you get a chance? It didn't show up in my messages... I don't want to waste the time pasting references and shit if you already got it.

Thanx

Offline DeJaVu

  • Adherent
  • *
  • Posts: 20
    • View Profile
Re: Shake n Bake Recipie #100 - My Detailed Contribution by Li Part 1 of 2
« Reply #68 on: November 26, 2014, 11:07:01 pm »
Venom,

Was looking back at the notes and realized that the reactants used in the reaction were purchased around March... The red hots were purchased recently at walleyworld, the Hexane was crc qd electronics cleaner and purchased recently, and the Li was purchased recently. Apparently Soda Steam bottles were used, so there were no issues maintaining very high pressure throughout the rxn.

Once again, there was absolutely no issue with bronzing the Li... But the bringingsame exact issues were observed with the visual differences of the rxn and the color, characteristics, and quality of the final product.

Just hoping that someone might find this information useful towards determining what may have changed...

Offline PurpleCow

  • Adherent
  • *
  • Posts: 96
    • View Profile
Re: Shake n Bake Recipie #100 - My Detailed Contribution by Li Part 1 of 2
« Reply #69 on: November 27, 2014, 02:28:12 am »
Venom,

Was looking back at the notes and realized that the reactants used in the reaction were purchased around March... The red hots were purchased recently at walleyworld, the Hexane was crc qd electronics cleaner and purchased recently, and the Li was purchased recently. Apparently Soda Steam bottles were used, so there were no issues maintaining very high pressure throughout the rxn.

Once again, there was absolutely no issue with bronzing the Li... But the bringingsame exact issues were observed with the visual differences of the rxn and the color, characteristics, and quality of the final product.

Just hoping that someone might find this information useful towards determining what may have changed...

DeJaVu, check this article out by tramp over at Wet Dreams

these are pictures of two different emulsifiers used as denaturants for pseudoephedrine cold pills...

This is an emulsifier. It is believed to be amine based but its true identity is unknown. She calls it the HellGaak. It does not succumb to solvents. Well, obviously it does, but it has identical solubility profile as the target molecule. It is active in exceptionally small amounts and and absolutely can hide inside clear as glass crystal... still not certain how it accomplishes this, but it indisputably can and will do so. Present in large enough amounts, it will inhibit steam distillation. In fact, that is its entire purpose: to inhibit separation. It is very exceptionally good at this. Notice how it looks so much like polysorbate 80:



(Polysorbate 80 is another heinous emulsifier. Typically found in red hots. Ugly shit. Inhibits crystallization. Inhibits reduction. Inhibits separation above all. Exceptionally difficult to remove.)

This is a picture of a non-polar freebase solution after the HellGaak emulsifier was forced to precipitate out of solution.
(She waits for a full moon, strips off all her clothes and dances until sunrise with a big red dragon. This induces separation!)
Clean freebase solution on top, HellGaak on bottom!


same thing viewed from above:


A Tale of Two Emulsifiers: Polysorbate 80 and HellGaak 1.0


The HellGaak emulsifier does same thing as polysorbate 80 --- essentially serves as an extraction inhibitor by preventing separation of aqueous and organic phases -- except HellGaak is very much more difficult to remove and very much more destructive...

this shit is super potent and seems effective in parts per thousand if not parts per ten thousand (or less) levels...
it takes a hell of a lot less of the new emulsifier than the old one... translated, it means one's extractions have to be better and one's techniques much, much better...

these emulsifiers are resistant to simple removal via solvent washes...
in fact, I do not believe it possible to remove either by solvents alone... especially the HellGaak... its soluble in everylast thing that pse and meth are soluble in...

this is an advanced American adulterant... polysorbate can be found everywhere but so far, the HellGaak variant appears isolated to the US...

the HellGaak appeared in American 120's right about the time the snb hysteria reached its peak...
the name brand 120's always were **very** vulnerable to anhydrous extraction...
the snb is nothing but an anhydrous extraction (among other things)...
the snb was putting unfavorable attention on manufacturer of the product so they developed a denaturant to specifically inhibit the product's use in the snb... they attacked it on the anhydrous extraction part of the reaction... the HellGaak does not prevent the pse from becoming freebase but it prevents the freebase from separating... it becomes an emulsion that cannot be broken by any normal means...

so they developed a gaak to defeat snb but it also defeats the tetra-trap in the process!

(tetrachloroethylene truly and sincerely serves no useful purpose except as a novelty bottom puller... after 11 years of messing with the shit, I finally accept that its truly useless against anything in the pills now. Does not hurt a thing but it accomplishes nothing either. At least not within the context of anhydorus extractions as they are commonly run. I've tried every combination of solvents imaginable both with and without the stuff. Same results with or without it. Its useless but not harmful.)

simple solvent washes/boils are useless against this modern type of emulsifier...
they dont completely remove polysorbate 80, either... in fact, that shit is real hard to separate even with chromatography...

fortunately, the newer emulsifiers seem restricted to the US and the older methods should still work just fine in those places...
O:-)
Where's Edify?

Offline DeJaVu

  • Adherent
  • *
  • Posts: 20
    • View Profile
Re: Shake n Bake Recipie #100 - My Detailed Contribution by Li Part 1 of 2
« Reply #70 on: November 27, 2014, 02:56:40 pm »
WOW... GREAT STUFF PurpleCow...

I have to say, that description of emulsifiers seems to match the results that I read about spot on... Everything seemed to work perfectly, other than a cloudy emulsion layer that simply would not clear regardless of time of the reaction or amount of Li bronzed and expended...

The filtered and cleaned fuel post reaction was clear as expected, but the final product definitely contained contaminate that should not have been there...

Upon drying, the salt contained brown impurities that seemed to be more prevalent the longer it dried... the product could be cleaned up a bit by manually removing these brown impurities, crushing remaining product very fine, and doing a good acetone wash, but the product was still very low quality street dope at best.

Thanx for ALL of the research and info PurpleCow... I, for one, really appreciate it.

 

Offline VenomStallone

  • Outlander
  • *
  • Posts: 18
  • BLTCC
    • View Profile
Re: Shake n Bake Recipie #100 - My Detailed Contribution by Li Part 1 of 2
« Reply #71 on: November 29, 2014, 04:39:57 am »
Purp: That hits the honey jar. Thank you for the excellent information. DejaVu, (i loved that nintendo game btw, but not as good as Uninvited), thats the dirt messing up the up the bees wing beat. But on to better things than lost pollen. Time to hit the honeycomb gentleman.

Offline PurpleCow

  • Adherent
  • *
  • Posts: 96
    • View Profile
Re: Shake n Bake Recipie #100 - My Detailed Contribution by Li Part 1 of 2
« Reply #72 on: November 29, 2014, 09:05:43 pm »
The vespiary?

The Zonez and Wetdreams are great sites. I have been trying to access The Collective but for some reason they are not taking new members.
Where's Edify?

Offline ChronicBoom!

  • Adherent
  • *
  • Posts: 31
    • View Profile
Re: Shake n Bake Recipie #100 - My Detailed Contribution by Li Part 1 of 2
« Reply #73 on: December 01, 2014, 06:24:34 pm »
That's strange. Have seen some pretty decent shit come out of this method without cleaning first. Is this just imagination, or can it still be just thrown in the bottle?
Signature

Offline PurpleCow

  • Adherent
  • *
  • Posts: 96
    • View Profile
Re: Shake n Bake Recipie #100 - My Detailed Contribution by Li Part 1 of 2
« Reply #74 on: December 01, 2014, 08:10:25 pm »
That's strange. Have seen some pretty decent shit come out of this method without cleaning first. Is this just imagination, or can it still be just thrown in the bottle?

Imo gup chucked with old feed stock will work. Gup chucked with feed stock from outside the US will work.
Where's Edify?