When should you cut someone off?

[inb4bowden]

From selling drugs to them, this is a hypothetical and philosophical question, let's assume they don't take drugs themselves, just sell them and demand is not an issue but supply is. Say you try to cut them off by raising the price but they just keep buying and you really want to just cut them off because you see them as a liability should they get busted. They're also annoying.

What would be the qualifications for cutting someone off? This thread doesn't really make any sense.

[millionsofdeadcats]

because you see them as a liability should they get busted

The minute you realize this, cut them off.  None of the other considerations should matter.

[inb4bowden]

well, I guess it depends on the nature of the liability, it's a different situation if you don't think they'd rat and are pretty good with not talking on the phone. Fuck, forget about that part actually, its more you feel they're stifling the diversification of bonz nigga

[millionsofdeadcats]

I meant, if they are a liability in a business sense.  It is your own personal decision to cut them off if they are just annoying or whatever.

[AlkieFish]

You can morally cut anyone off at any time, except family, not morally anyway.

[equanimity]

Wonder what was going through his mind when he made those posts, and then edited them.  You saw it, right cats?  What a weird thing to do.

To answer the question as it sits: never.  Defensive driving is best for you and me.

[millionsofdeadcats]

He will probably edit most of his posts, as he says he is leaving

[aldra]

What if they're driving a BMW mini?

never, but a Mini Cooper on the other hand...

[equanimity]

He will probably edit most of his posts, as he says he is leaving

That would take forever.  Guess it's a good thing ~half of his accounts are banned.  Big time saver.

[Arnox]

Posts restored.

[millionsofdeadcats]

Posts restored.

errrrr, wait, didn't that user edit them?  Or did someone else?  I missed it. 

If the user himself edited them, why not leave it be? 

[equanimity]

Posts restored.

inb4 shitstorm

[millionsofdeadcats]

inb4 shitstorm

  

[mmmmmmmQuestions]

person of no longer interest: hey man, I need moar droogz

you: i'm out of the game. the heat is too hot. just never call me again

person of no longer interest: shit well ah--

*hang up, snap your phone in half, throw it into a nearby pond or gully, retreat to Mexico, etc.

[Arnox]

If the user himself edited them, why not leave it be? 

Because it makes topics unreadable. This is unfair to anyone else reading these past topics.

As I said a long time ago. What gets posted here, stays here. (For the most part.)