Author Topic: ConsPiaRcy!1!11!!!  (Read 2116 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Hex535

  • Adherent
  • *
  • Posts: 77
    • View Profile
ConsPiaRcy!1!11!!!
« on: May 25, 2014, 02:32:40 pm »
Dis whole entire forum.....

IS ONE GIANT CHATBOX WHERE INFINITYSHOCK AND ARNOX CAN ARGUE ABOUT WEATHER OR NOT POSTING BESTIALITY IS COOL.

You've been warned newcomers and fellow fweindey dendis
Then this ebony bird beguiling my sad fancy into smiling,
By the grave and stern decorum of the countenance it wore.
Though thy crest be shorn and shaven, thou," I said, "art sure no craven,
Ghastly grim and ancient raven wandering from the Nightly shore —
Tell me what thy lordly name is on the Night's Plutonian shore!"
Quoth the Raven, "Nevermore."

Offline Infinityshock

  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,886
    • View Profile
Re: ConsPiaRcy!1!11!!!
« Reply #1 on: May 25, 2014, 04:40:42 pm »
Dis whole entire forum.....

IS ONE GIANT CHATBOX WHERE INFINITYSHOCK AND ARNOX CAN ARGUE ABOUT WEATHER OR NOT POSTING BESTIALITY IS COOL.

You've been warned newcomers and fellow fweindey dendis

i dont recall any discussions about the weather, although it is quite hot where i am. 

not posting bestiality is certainly not cool. 

Offline Arnox

  • Administrator
  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,053
  • Relax, my friend.
    • View Profile
Re: ConsPiaRcy!1!11!!!
« Reply #2 on: May 25, 2014, 08:36:46 pm »
:oface:

He's right!


Time is always against you in some way or another.

email: fakeout0@yahoo.com

Offline Infinityshock

  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,886
    • View Profile
Re: ConsPiaRcy!1!11!!!
« Reply #3 on: May 25, 2014, 10:17:38 pm »

Offline Arnox

  • Administrator
  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,053
  • Relax, my friend.
    • View Profile
Re: ConsPiaRcy!1!11!!!
« Reply #4 on: May 25, 2014, 10:45:02 pm »
of course im right.

And over here, we see how the proper use of quotes is needed. Because I was talking to the OP, not the person above me. Someone who knew how to use quotes would know that. lol


Time is always against you in some way or another.

email: fakeout0@yahoo.com

Offline Infinityshock

  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,886
    • View Profile
Re: ConsPiaRcy!1!11!!!
« Reply #5 on: May 25, 2014, 11:11:48 pm »
I made the last post,  prior to yours, meaning your post was a reply to mine considering there was no post quoted

Offline Arnox

  • Administrator
  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,053
  • Relax, my friend.
    • View Profile
Re: ConsPiaRcy!1!11!!!
« Reply #6 on: May 25, 2014, 11:39:40 pm »
I made the last post,  prior to yours, meaning your post was a reply to mine considering there was no post quoted
Nope. It means I'm talking to the OP.


Time is always against you in some way or another.

email: fakeout0@yahoo.com

Offline Infinityshock

  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,886
    • View Profile
Re: ConsPiaRcy!1!11!!!
« Reply #7 on: May 25, 2014, 11:57:54 pm »
Not in this version of reality and internet etiquette.

Offline Idiosyncrasy

  • Arch Disciple
  • ***
  • Posts: 617
    • View Profile
    • Raw Data for Raw Nerves
Re: ConsPiaRcy!1!11!!!
« Reply #8 on: May 26, 2014, 12:25:50 am »
Actually, you are both correct. An unquoted reply can be in response to the OP or the previous post. In the case of a string of exchanges between people, quoting each other would only occupy excess space and would be unnecessary for continuity. However, one can also reply directly to the OP without quotes because the general thread topic surrounds the OP topic. It would also appear funny to quote the OP because everyone has read at least the OP.

This is where reading comprehension, context clues, and critical thinking come into play. If an average reader possesses at least two of these skills, then he or she can typically determine the flow of the thread and make an educated deduction about the meaning or intent of the post in question, or at least infer from it what the poster intends to convey and to whom he or she is replying.

Offline Arnox

  • Administrator
  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,053
  • Relax, my friend.
    • View Profile
Re: ConsPiaRcy!1!11!!!
« Reply #9 on: May 26, 2014, 12:35:08 am »
Not in this version of reality and internet etiquette.
I reject your reality.



Actually, you are both correct. An unquoted reply can be in response to the OP or the previous post. In the case of a string of exchanges between people, quoting each other would only occupy excess space and would be unnecessary for continuity. However, one can also reply directly to the OP without quotes because the general thread topic surrounds the OP topic. It would also appear funny to quote the OP because everyone has read at least the OP.

This is where reading comprehension, context clues, and critical thinking come into play. If an average reader possesses at least two of these skills, then he or she can typically determine the flow of the thread and make an educated deduction about the meaning or intent of the post in question, or at least infer from it what the poster intends to convey and to whom he or she is replying.
It can work both ways but it's so much simpler and better to do things the proper way instead of hoping others will know who you're talking to.


Time is always against you in some way or another.

email: fakeout0@yahoo.com

Offline Idiosyncrasy

  • Arch Disciple
  • ***
  • Posts: 617
    • View Profile
    • Raw Data for Raw Nerves
Re: ConsPiaRcy!1!11!!!
« Reply #10 on: May 26, 2014, 12:41:08 am »
I'm curious to see the published, accepted, and adopted rules of internet language and etiquette that you define as "proper."

Offline Arnox

  • Administrator
  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,053
  • Relax, my friend.
    • View Profile
Re: ConsPiaRcy!1!11!!!
« Reply #11 on: May 26, 2014, 01:17:27 am »
I'm curious to see the published, accepted, and adopted rules of internet language and etiquette that you define as "proper."

lol

Dude, it's just like you said. The thread centers around the OP. Posts without quotes are assumed to be addressed to it. Because it's centered around the OP. Go on any forum and you'll see the same thing. But if you really demand proof that it's the "proper" way of doing things, I could ask you for the same, the other way around.


Time is always against you in some way or another.

email: fakeout0@yahoo.com

Offline Infinityshock

  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,886
    • View Profile
Re: ConsPiaRcy!1!11!!!
« Reply #12 on: May 26, 2014, 01:31:18 am »
Not in this version of reality and internet etiquette.
I reject your reality.



Actually, you are both correct. An unquoted reply can be in response to the OP or the previous post. In the case of a string of exchanges between people, quoting each other would only occupy excess space and would be unnecessary for continuity. However, one can also reply directly to the OP without quotes because the general thread topic surrounds the OP topic. It would also appear funny to quote the OP because everyone has read at least the OP.

This is where reading comprehension, context clues, and critical thinking come into play. If an average reader possesses at least two of these skills, then he or she can typically determine the flow of the thread and make an educated deduction about the meaning or intent of the post in question, or at least infer from it what the poster intends to convey and to whom he or she is replying.
It can work both ways but it's so much simpler and better to do things the proper way instead of hoping others will know who you're talking to.

you can reject reality all you want, it doesnt change its accuracy

Offline Idiosyncrasy

  • Arch Disciple
  • ***
  • Posts: 617
    • View Profile
    • Raw Data for Raw Nerves
Re: ConsPiaRcy!1!11!!!
« Reply #13 on: May 26, 2014, 01:40:42 am »
I'm curious to see the published, accepted, and adopted rules of internet language and etiquette that you define as "proper."

lol

Dude, it's just like you said. The thread centers around the OP. Posts without quotes are assumed to be addressed to it. Because it's centered around the OP. Go on any forum and you'll see the same thing. But if you really demand proof that it's the "proper" way of doing things, I could ask you for the same, the other way around.

The burden of proof is on the accusing party. You accuse one of being improper, while I believe that both ways can be generally accepted.

Offline Arnox

  • Administrator
  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,053
  • Relax, my friend.
    • View Profile
Re: ConsPiaRcy!1!11!!!
« Reply #14 on: May 26, 2014, 01:44:57 am »
The burden of proof is on the accusing party. You accuse one of being improper, while I believe that both ways can be generally accepted.
My way is better and much more people conform to it. That's my proof.


Time is always against you in some way or another.

email: fakeout0@yahoo.com