Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - DeJaVu

Pages: [1] 2
1
Thank you for the info Al...

- 2.88g pse - wally world generic reds
- Wash crushed pill mass in non-polar for 6 hrs then decant and dry
- 3/8 cup NaOH
- 3/16 cup an (NaOH and an increased from 1/4 cup and 1/8 cup respectively to make rxn more violent... Dissolves Li quicker, and seems to make product more potent)
- Rarely recharge
- 2 AA Li strips
- 500ml reaction bottle
- Approx 300-350ml non-polar (ether or Hexane or both)
- Pse (pill mass) added when Li = approx 75% bronzed
- Multiple water washes
- Liquid-Liquid water/muriatic extraction

If any additional info Would help, please let me know...

Would you be willing to elaborate on "Proper ratios", "adjusted timings", and "diligent workups" please?

Thanks again for contributing brother.

-me

2
Next time I hear of it, I shall be sure there are details of the reaction. Sounds very worth it to have them on record.

Right on Brother,  and the same goes for me...

3
Seeing that the notes that I found only referenced 2 recent reactions, and they were both done with generic wally red hots, I am interested in everyone's recent experience with different sources of feed stock...

Lets face it... If the write up that purp found on WD is accurate, it states that a certain pharm company created this Hell Gak as a deturant...but there are many different companies that produce the feed stock... Without intervention from the bad guys, I couldn't imagine that these various pharm companies go around sharing technologies...especially when it relates to unidentified, unlabled, secret ingredients that would be in direct violation of FDA regulations...

I'm not saying that the shit don't exist, I'm just saying that I would be very, VERY interested in reading some detailed reports about reactions run by SWIY with with different brands and variations of feed stock...

I know that the person that wrote the notes that I found wasn't intending to run any experiments in the foreseeable future, but I believe that this person is the type that will end up doing the research in the name of OUR cause, intellectual curiosity, and for all of those brothers and sisters that are REAL and paved the path of knowledge for him...

If you catz sincerely believe in your rights and freedoms, the best way you can excercise and retain them is to CONTRIBUTE to the cause that supports them... A collection of detailed ACCURATE reports from the collective can quickly and easily provide CONCLUSIVE answers to some important questions...

- Are ALL the common feed stocks showing these same tainted results?
- If not...which are and which are not?
- Are different geographical locations seeing different results from the feed stock?

Once these questions have been addressed conclusively. Bees can share experiences and results pertaining to pre reaction washes/extractions and post reaction workups...

I promise you, the last 2 batches that I read about were contaminated, but they WERE DOPE, and still better than some shit that has been purchased on the street over the years... I am not convinced that this shit can not be easily cleaned up before or after, but it takes much time for one....many minds and shared efforts and results are the only effective means to battle the bad guys.... If you will not contribute, then you deserve to snort/smoke/bang your Gaak poisons and I hope that it's a slow painful death...

If you care and want results...AND WANT TO WIN... Please CONTRIBUTE!!!

4
I'd like to point out that the SnB was one of the biggest spankings the bad guys have ever received in their "war on drugs"... That tek progressed tenfold and traveled the globe because of DETAILED CONTRIBUTION BY MANY on the old site...

If such contribution, and detailed reports on theory and experience was resurrected in a forum such as this...the speed at which their feeble efforts would be squashed would be astounding...

Some bees have alwayz beelived that EVERYONE has something to contribute, and the collective knowledge and experience of ALL builds the TRUE strength of the colony...

Heed the call...contribute...and it could be like Dejavu...

If you do not wish to contribute, then you are a PUSSY FAGGOT, and you should know that I fuck your little sister up her little brownhole... I'm just sayin...

-Me

5
WOW... GREAT STUFF PurpleCow...

I have to say, that description of emulsifiers seems to match the results that I read about spot on... Everything seemed to work perfectly, other than a cloudy emulsion layer that simply would not clear regardless of time of the reaction or amount of Li bronzed and expended...

The filtered and cleaned fuel post reaction was clear as expected, but the final product definitely contained contaminate that should not have been there...

Upon drying, the salt contained brown impurities that seemed to be more prevalent the longer it dried... the product could be cleaned up a bit by manually removing these brown impurities, crushing remaining product very fine, and doing a good acetone wash, but the product was still very low quality street dope at best.

Thanx for ALL of the research and info PurpleCow... I, for one, really appreciate it.

 

6
Venom,

Was looking back at the notes and realized that the reactants used in the reaction were purchased around March... The red hots were purchased recently at walleyworld, the Hexane was crc qd electronics cleaner and purchased recently, and the Li was purchased recently. Apparently Soda Steam bottles were used, so there were no issues maintaining very high pressure throughout the rxn.

Once again, there was absolutely no issue with bronzing the Li... But the bringingsame exact issues were observed with the visual differences of the rxn and the color, characteristics, and quality of the final product.

Just hoping that someone might find this information useful towards determining what may have changed...

7
Venom,

Can you let me know if you received my pm when you get a chance? It didn't show up in my messages... I don't want to waste the time pasting references and shit if you already got it.

Thanx

8
Purple,

Another great reference and procedure...

I want to point out that a procedure like that would be well worth performing so that a gup chucked vs. Extracted pfed experiment could be properly performed and definitive results could be achieved...

With that said,, this process of extracting pse would not be practicle for the tek outlined in this forum... The average expected yields of the tek are about 1.5 - 3g of product for each bake... The quantity simply doesn't justify the cost/effort/time/smell associated with the extraction...

I think it's important to remember that this tek CAN produce "BANG ASS DOPE"... But the TRUE goal and advantages of this tek is to produce very respectively GOOD product quickly, easily, and cheaply...

With that in mind, this is just a personal idea/theory that could be tried...

I know that in the old "Annie" dayz, some enthusiasts would would use sodium hydroxide and ammonium nitrate in non polar to generate ammonia gas... Then they would just though the gup chucked pill mass in, give the psed time to base, and then either use the "extracted" pse in base form or perform an a/b extraction and use the pse hcl for their actual cook.

If one were to do say:

Soak the pse pill mass in np for a 6 hours prior to getting started, then siphon off and discard the "wash fuel" containing the non polar soluble impurities from the pill mass.

Dry and 're-crush the pill mass and the through it in a shake bottle with some np, lye, and an for maybe 30-45 min shaking it around now and then to get all of the pse to base.

Filter off and perform a/b on the fuel to retrieve "extracted" pse hcl crystals for use in actual cook...

Obviuosly this would not be as pure as the tek that you posted, but my thoughts are that it should be pretty damn good...and even though it's a pain in the ass compared to simply gup chucking, it requires no new materials and no New process for the baker to learn.

Thoughts?

9
Rather than trying to type out a thesis on this, that I guarantee i'll fuck up the explanation on as I don't have the chemistry/physics background to truly understand it all, I will pm you a pdf, or a link to it, that will give you all the info that you will ever need... This article is a fucking goldmine imo.

Then, I'll just follow it up with an explanation oh how this information has apparently been observed and applied in real practicle experience, according to the notes that I found...

10
Venom,

There's a lot in those notes that I found that I want to pass onto you and any others that may find it as interesting as I have...

First, the simple answer without supporting explaination...based on what I have read, I can PROMISE you that the Transition to a Metallic State (TMS) is not the issue, or any issue at all. Keep a bucket of cold water handy... When you have produced a significant portion of the brackish flakes, let pressure build to near your venting threshold and then cool the reaction by setting the bottle in the cold water... This will slow the reaction, reduce the pressure, and cause all those flakes to surface, and get skinny, and stick together, and create shiny bbs and puddles of golden mercury... And fuel will clear as all the Li(NH3)4 clears out of the fuel.

Explaination.... I am typing on a phone at the moment, and have no access to the notes that I transposed, but this evening I will try to locate an amazing research report regarding TMS that really gives a lot more understanding of the physics of this reaction... Off the top of my head I will explain a little the best that I can as it relates to transition shifts that you are explaining...

First of all, it's relatively easy to manipulate the Li(NH3)4 phases from the brackish flakes to the copper bbs to to golden mercury and vice versa (I honestly don't understand a lot of it, and I'm ok admitting that as the leading physicists in the field don't fully understand it at this point), but the factors that are being balanced to maintain the small window of the actual TMS are pressure, temperatue, and saturation of free electrons... It's pretty amazing to see when you know what to watch for (at least from what I read)... The lightly saturated solution will cause a clear fuel to take on a faint blue tint caused by the energy of the traveling free electrons...(the faint color is actually the tail end of the elections...like a comet...crossing into the visible plain.. Shit outta time 4 now... I'll try to pass more on with references soon...

11
Funny coincidence... I found a paper next to a trash can at a gas station that referred to a couple of similar experiences recently... It interested me, as most things do, so I took it home and typed it out for future research planning to take the original to the local authorities, but Damn if I didn't lose it... Old age I guess... Anyway, here's some of what must have been notes or a research journal entry or some shit like that:

First 2 batches after takin a few months off:

First batch:
Bout 6 grams of generic red hots (simple fuel wash of pill mesh and decant) then gup chucked...
Normal reactants, Hexane, Li x3...
Li -> LI(NH3)4 just as smooth and easy as ever...

Observations upon addition of pill mass:
Fuel is dark and cloudy from li saturation, but never seems to achieve the thicker "chocolate milk" appearance expected when the pse bases...
After completely exhausting the Li/bronze:
The fuel remained dark and cloudy...took 5-10 min for the dark cloud mass to settle 1/2 way down the bottle... Never formed a the expected Li Amide distinct Gray Sandy looking top layer above the reactants...

Filtering:
Filters we're full of a of a lavender colored slime as the clear fuel was filtered...

Final product:
Potentcy was actually surprisingly pretty good - 7 out of 10
Purity was noticeably lower than expected... Color a little off when melted... Obvious black residue left as it burned up... 5 out of 10
Yield: expected about 4g ma... Ended with 3g... 5 out of 10

Second batch:
Same other than bout 3g pse and Li x2...
Maybe most beautiful TMS ever done... Fuel maintained with a nice light blue tint... Complete beautiful puddle of bronze mercury floating on the fuel...

Addition of pse...
Same issues as first batch but even more pronounced this time...

Potentcy - sucked - 5 out of 10
Purity -  same issues as batch one with noticeable pinwheels throughout dried crystals and very slow to crack back when melted. 3 out of 10
Yield - expected about 1.9g ma... Ended with about 1.4g ma and pse - 4 out of 10


Just thought I would pass that along as it seemed to have some relavence... I guess the smart chem enthusiast would do nearly identical rxns...1 With gup chilucked and one extracted...

Personally, I am FAR more intrigued by the beez and the effs and the EssNbeez... My friend (or bff as the kids say now) sayz that the best trip experience she ever had was getting lost in the web chasing beez...wondering if it was a never ending rabbit hole or is she had simply imagined the trail she thought she was following in her state of delirium...

I was awed by brief communications and interaction with an uncle that I sadly didn't maintain contact with... I never could follow all of his technical writing, which was like poetry, but I guess that is to be expected without formal trading in the art of that cryptic language...

Maybe if I had been in a different circle a different time... who knows... So many mysteries and such a short life to acquire knowledge...

Y'all rock.



12
Must be charged fuel from the reaction... Fresh fuel will neither help nor hurt...

After rxn and water washes, set aside maybe 20ml of fuel as bring back...

Not a bad idea to keep 20 - 50ml of bring back fuel in the freezer in case you ever come up short after a run.

If you are just slightly acidic, tap water will actually bring the ph back up a little...assuming you are not using well water.

I believe that the OP of this recepie finds the following to be the simplest and best route for her:

1) set aside about 20ml of bring back fuel
2) add about 10-15ml of bottled water to fuel/Neff solution
3) add 2 drops of muriatic acid at a time to neutralize solution ( shake well after each addition)
4) continue until the fuel goes cloudy and will not go clear again after shaking (you will be able to tell...the fuel should be completely clear prior to this process and Will continue returning to completely clear after shaking until PH drops below 7...then it will be obviously foggy)
5)add the 15-20ml of the bring back fuel and shake and the fuel Will be clear again (indicating that the PH is above 7)
6)seperate and evap water.

No need to waste time/money/effort with testing PH repeatedly as PH will likely be somewhere in the 7.2-7.5 range which is great. (Feel free to test the final PH if it sets your mind at ease.

If you go far below neural and do not have resources to bring back, you can alwayz rebase the meth and then do another a/b extraction, but I don't have the time to cover it now...

Great link there Purple Cow.

13
Sad news to me. If you can't recrystallize shake and bake, then you can't recrystallized any meth. You need to do a two part recrystallisation with acetone and isopropanol alcohol or denatured alcohol. Or if you're the patient type, just let that water sit around until it completely drives into one solid chunk that you're looking for

14
Better Living Through Chemistry / Re: Wanna SnB? READ THIS FIRST!
« on: October 09, 2014, 12:22:12 am »
Whenever doing a s&b never use water to kick off the reaction. With the proper weight ratios of ingredients it will kick off. If the reaction does not you can depending on vessel apply heat to kick it off by A. Placing in microwave for seconds and this will get that bitch bumping. There has been some really neat shit into using nukes to drive reactions and also greatly reducing the amount of time. Yeah just never ever use water it's the start to a bad ending on so many levels

I hear a cloth-type heating pad works very well. Heats it up evenly and won't get too hot.

If you absolutly must use water, use no more than 5ml. Any more you Li will likely ignight. I have seen teks calling for up to 1/4 cups of water. Serious. Best case with adding more than a few ml of water is you will only burn up a large portion of the precious Lithium.

The  real intent of the water is to facilitate the reaction of the  Sodium Hydroxide with the Ammonia Nitrate. One may do this by introduction of a trivial amount of humidity to one or either of these. Too much moisture is  if the reactants clump or are visually melty.

Heating pad is ideal. Warm oil bath works well but gets the RV very messy. Blow dryer works well but must be used with caution for the same reasons as the microwave.

Grinding the sodium hydroxide and the ammonium nitrate to a fine powder will also give more surface area contact of the reactants and promote the initiation of the reactant.

Mixing the chemicals with a plastic hanger or something similar Will also get the reaction to kick off for the same reasons.

NO water should EVER be used... Not only for safety, but for yield... WATER IS THE BAKERS ENEMY!!!

More water = lower yield

Non polars should be COMPLETELY dried if washed and great care should be taken to keep the reactants sealed air tight with as little exposure to the moisture in the air as possible prior to use.

15
I'm going to say that I agree. There were so many people that were posting before that I had only one from me. To which I said 'thank you' to all the people posting. I think I am upwards of 9 now. But mine are of no relevant value. There was so much intelligence within those pages that I was afraid to say anything in fear of showing my ignorance. What would it take for us to get a thriving community such as before? To have the amount of dialog again so one can pick and choose what they were interested in and then get involved. Its unfair because I had only just begun and all seems to be gone forever. I am thankful to all those in the past for showing me that intimidation is only an excuse used to not attempt.

Amp,

Just remember that NO ONE posting on the thread that you are referring to knew less than Li(NH3)4. If I remember correctly, a few months before she posted that recepie, she didn't even know what a non polar solvent was and she had to look up every other word and chemical online just to understand what everyone else was talking about...

But she believed in herself, and she was determined, and I can ensure you that she left NOTHING out and had no interest in getting paid.

I must agree though... I will miss all of the great rants and dialog from that thread.

Pages: [1] 2