The Sanctuary
Carnality => Sex & Affection => Topic started by: oppenheimmer on August 12, 2014, 04:31:07 pm
-
I was in the local rat hole and the folks and i where talking and virginity's where the topic so we where all telling are story's laughing and chatting, then getting on to the age off consent witch is where i shocked some friends by saying it a load off crap, point being who the fuck is aloud to tell you when your body and mind are ready to bust a nut or glaze the donut.
so i thought what fuck i i'll see what all the "meth heads" and faggots have to say
1.so what age you lose you virginity?
2.whats your view on the age off consent lower it, higher it or abolish it?
1.13
2. abolish it
-
I lost my virginity at the ripe old age of 18. And I am glad I waited for someone so special rather than fucking the first hood rat who came along.
In my state age of consent is 16. I think that is fair but I would also think it reasonable to say once you become a teenager you are ready to make your own decision. I say this because anyone under around 13 or so is much easier to take advantage of sexually simply because their naivete makes it much less probable that they fully understand what they are doing.
-
1. As of yet undetermined.
2. I really don't care.
-
1. 14(god damn OH, u beat me by 1)
2. abolish that shit
-
so that explains it then chris
arnox we need to get you to the brass house lad
Tc i knew you was a pimp just like me :)
-
I just realized the irony between being ChrisHansensGhost and my position on this issue. lulz.
-
13
Leave it up to the parents and if something were to happen (sexual assault) let the parents handle it and let the police handle the clean up
-
1. Seventeen
2. I think it should be left as is. In my state it's 16 and extenuating circumstances aside that seems pretty rational to me.
-
1. 14
2. Abolish it, girls of all ages want the D.
-
i will never have a gf
kill all fucking whores
-
I was 22 (I know I'm lame) could have gone sooner but I chose to wait mostly out of paranoia that I would knock them up. Lol
And I think it should be 16. Its fine where its at.
-
Im a 30 year old virgin , fuck my life. And meh i dont think there should be a limit at all , people are ready when they are ready
-
tfw no gf reporting in.
-
I was in the local rat hole and the folks and i where talking and virginity's where the topic so we where all telling are story's laughing and chatting, then getting on to the age off consent witch is where i shocked some friends by saying it a load off crap, point being who the fuck is aloud to tell you when your body and mind are ready to bust a nut or glaze the donut.
so i thought what fuck i i'll see what all the "meth heads" and faggots have to say
1.so what age you lose you virginity?
2.whats your view on the age off consent lower it, higher it or abolish it?
1.13
2. abolish it
I never lost my vaginity :( I am 32 and a half and lost my cock in a motorbike accident
Where the chain severed it, I survived but my cock and balls didn't
I never got to have sex, what a cruel world :(
-
18.
My state the age of consent is 18 unless the age gap is less than 4 years, then the age of consent is 16. I think the 4 year rule is a decent rule and should be kept in place even if the age of consent was lowered to say 14. Once you are 18, you should be allowed to do whatever you want with whoever you want.
-
no sex yet. wish they would get rid of age of consent. there are countries where children can get married.
-
no sex yet. wish they would get rid of age of consent. there are countries where children can get married.
Age of consent is no real obstacle if you know how to play the game. Are you old enough to buy booze? If so, spread the word around your local high schools (and middle schools if you think you can swing it) that you're willing to trade wine coolers for blowjobs and sex. Don't use your real identity, of course, and if SHTF, back the fuck out and lie low for a while.
Recipe for success.
-
no sex yet. wish they would get rid of age of consent. there are countries where children can get married.
Age of consent is no real obstacle if you know how to play the game. Are you old enough to buy booze? If so, spread the word around your local high schools (and middle schools if you think you can swing it) that you're willing to trade wine coolers for blowjobs and sex. Don't use your real identity, of course, and if SHTF, back the fuck out and lie low for a while.
Recipe for success.
youre setting your standards too high.
find a nice petting zoo somewhere that you can pay a visit to at night and you dont have to worry about witnesses. or unwilling partners for that matter.
-
Ugh, kill yourself.
-
you said that already. it only makes you look like more of an idiot when you repeat yourself
-
My IQ is 140, don't make me come over there boy.
ALL HAIL JAILBAIT
-
whomever told you that, lied
-
1) 16
2) I am into MILFs and Cougar hunting, so don't really care.
-
Nevermind. Reading comprehension, ftw
-
AOC in England is 16. I wouldn't lower it. And if for example an 18 year old is taken to court for having sex with a 15 yr old then the case should be sensibly judged on the ability of all involved to give consent. Jails need to be filled with low life scum, not kids who got lucky.
-
12
Wait, does dream-sex count?
-
1. 16 and a bit
2. Menstruation/Ejaculation is a clear sign that your biology is ready to go. Beyond this, all other considerations are pretty much cultural/religious social rules and pretty much useless in the modern days of contraception.
-
1. 16 and a bit
2. Menstruation/Ejaculation is a clear sign that your biology is ready to go. Beyond this, all other considerations are pretty much cultural/religious social rules and pretty much useless in the modern days of contraception.
Agreed.
-
I was 15.
Age of consent here in Norway is 16. I think having one is a good thing. Keeps 40 year olds away from our 13 year olds.
-
1. As of yet undetermined.
2. I really don't care.
the visions become reality 8)
-
1. no
2. no
-
2. Menstruation/Ejaculation is a clear sign that your biology is ready to go. Beyond this, all other considerations are pretty much cultural/religious social rules and pretty much useless in the modern days of contraception.
Muhammad approves. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aisha)
-
1-I was 15
2-its hard to put an age that EVERYONE is emotionally and physically mature enough to be ready for it, but 16 seems to be a pretty safe bet. it was 17 in texas, but if the two people were close in age the state would not press charges. here in PA its 16 but the parents have to give consent...which pretty much means its 18.
-
Muhammad approves.
The fact that "The Prophet", may Allah bless him - or not, i'm not that much into guys who claim to have seen "the light" regardless of what they call their god- approves or not adds or distracts very little to the validity of my opinion.
Fact remains that regardless of religion, many regions in the world share my point of view. Every culture looks down on pre-pubescent sex, many cultures, regardless of religion, are perfectly fine with sexually mature people having a roll in the hay.
And unlike islam, many of these cultures also have no problem with unmarried people having a roll in the hay. Especially those less obsessed with the christian/judaic/muslim virginity cult.
As an aside: even our western -christian- age of consent concept changed numerous times throughout history.
-
Muhammad approves.
The fact that "The Prophet", may Allah bless him - or not, i'm not that much into guys who claim to have seen "the light" regardless of what they call their god- approves or not adds or distracts very little to the validity of my opinion.
Fact remains that regardless of religion, many regions in the world share my point of view. Every culture looks down on pre-pubescent sex, many cultures, regardless of religion, are perfectly fine with sexually mature people having a roll in the hay.
And unlike islam, many of these cultures also have no problem with unmarried people having a roll in the hay. Especially those less obsessed with the christian/judaic/muslim virginity cult.
As an aside: even our western -christian- age of consent concept changed numerous times throughout history.
The median age of menarche is under 13; (http://www.bmj.com/content/322/7294/1095) by your logic fucking a 9 year old could be perfectly acceptable because their "biology is ready to go". That's bullshit. Physical and mental development at such an age are not synchronous, not that either would be at all likely to developed enough to safely engage in sexual relations. And that this was deemed acceptable in the past (http://discover-the-truth.com/2013/09/09/age-of-consent-in-european-american-history/) and by some today is irrelevant; that some degenerates past and present agree with you proves they hold the same opinion, not that your opinion is correct.
-
In my logic it would mean that, regardless of age, if a sexually mature boy/girl decides to have sex with someone, they're ready. I rather doubt a 9 yo would wake up one morning going "gee, that virginity thing is overrated, time to lose it by bed time tonight" The same goes for most (if by no means all) 13 yo's. But at some point in time hormones will take over, and sex is gonna happen. I fail to see how imposing some arbitrary age of consent by law would change that (or how this would somehow protect "the children" for that matter).
As for the correctness of my opinion, it's just that: an opinion. And i stand by it, regardless of what jesus, mohammed, Jahweh or Budda has to say about it. None the less, i don't see you disproving my statement that consensus on the actual age of consent (as most other laws regarding sex) is rooted in culture and religion, not some enlightened idea of being sexually (or otherwise) mature. Otherwise we wouldn't see such diversity of regulations throughout time or geography.
-
Rotterdam is a funny name IMO
-
I'd have to say whatever goes along the lines of as long as she under a zygote it dont matter
-
1. As of yet undetermined.
2. I really don't care.
lul something tells me arcocks wouldn't admit to this these days. Surprised he didn't get more flack for this.
-
In my logic it would mean that, regardless of age, if a sexually mature boy/girl decides to have sex with someone, they're ready. I rather doubt a 9 yo would wake up one morning going "gee, that virginity thing is overrated, time to lose it by bed time tonight" The same goes for most (if by no means all) 13 yo's. But at some point in time hormones will take over, and sex is gonna happen. I fail to see how imposing some arbitrary age of consent by law would change that (or how this would somehow protect "the children" for that matter).
As for the correctness of my opinion, it's just that: an opinion. And i stand by it, regardless of what jesus, mohammed, Jahweh or Budda has to say about it. None the less, i don't see you disproving my statement that consensus on the actual age of consent (as most other laws regarding sex) is rooted in culture and religion, not some enlightened idea of being sexually (or otherwise) mature. Otherwise we wouldn't see such diversity of regulations throughout time or geography.
I imagine NAMBLA would approve of your thoughts.
-
...
I imagine NAMBLA would approve of your thoughts.
I suppose they would. Though i dont approve all that much of them.