RIP Pill Popper

[unbreakable matter]

He will never be able to figure out how to get here, let alone post

He tried to post a youtube video once and instead posted the google search results for a misspelled video

[splooge gook]

pill popper 4 president of the united states

[unbreakable matter]

pill popper 4 president of sandwich club

[Michael Myers]

pill popper 4 president of holland

[Soso0]

Poor n00b. Was he banned or did Zoklet go down already

[zok jr.]

I heard there were sandwiches in this thread...

[Dumpster Slut]

He will never be able to figure out how to get here, let alone post

He tried to post a youtube video once and instead posted the google search results for a misspelled video

I never realized that a risk averse basic strategy is actually a contradiction given basic strategy has a negative expectation. So, given a task of maximizing the EV/SD you actually have to MAX your stdev, I was an idiot for not acknowledging the denominator effect.

So, if your ev is -.05 and your SD is 1.0, you're actually better off on risk adjusted basis by making your SD 1.1,1.2... 1,237,838 ~ if you can simultaneously hold ev constant

[Dumpster Slut]

So it seems basic strategy is actually an optimal strategy.... I tried to kill it at least, maybe I'll actually find a flaw in the future..

[Pill Popper]

He will never be able to figure out how to get here, let alone post

He tried to post a youtube video once and instead posted the google search results for a misspelled video

Really you think I would just go away that easy. Boy you really are a half tard and by the way shouldn't you be in jail somewhere getting raped repeatedly

[Michael Myers]

Hai pill popper!

[Township Rebellion]

lololol 100K Hyundais.

[unbreakable matter]

He will never be able to figure out how to get here, let alone post

He tried to post a youtube video once and instead posted the google search results for a misspelled video

I never realized that a risk averse basic strategy is actually a contradiction given basic strategy has a negative expectation. So, given a task of maximizing the EV/SD you actually have to MAX your stdev, I was an idiot for not acknowledging the denominator effect.

So, if your ev is -.05 and your SD is 1.0, you're actually better off on risk adjusted basis by making your SD 1.1,1.2... 1,237,838 ~ if you can simultaneously hold ev constant

yeah, I was talking to my brother the other day and he said him and his buddy went down to the casino a year or so ago and his buddy went in the high rollers room and was betting quarters (min bet) and my brothr just sat, chilled and counted talking to the boss and dealer and jumping in when the count was optimal. He said they made $1750 in 3 days by hedging bets and positive progressions when the count/EV was favorable I think it was basically 500% at +4 or something to that effect. He exaggerates sometimes because he talks to women a lot and its kinda annoying. I'm gonna check up on that SD because that seems correct but factoring it as 200% when it's so close to the mean seems dangerous and quantitative progressions are better to take account of nawmean. When I get some time I'll go full autism and try to figure it out but I think you're on the right track, at least what you're saying is true

[Pill Popper]

lololol 100K Hyundais.

Meh better then paying that for a shitty benz that won't be worth five grand in three years. Love my Genesis and could care less what a welfare bum thinks

[unbreakable matter]

oh my god, pill popper WOULD drive a hyundai, they're the pill poppers of cars

I bet he literally bought a tiberon before

[Almost Fat]

He will never be able to figure out how to get here, let alone post

He tried to post a youtube video once and instead posted the google search results for a misspelled video

I never realized that a risk averse basic strategy is actually a contradiction given basic strategy has a negative expectation. So, given a task of maximizing the EV/SD you actually have to MAX your stdev, I was an idiot for not acknowledging the denominator effect.

So, if your ev is -.05 and your SD is 1.0, you're actually better off on risk adjusted basis by making your SD 1.1,1.2... 1,237,838 ~ if you can simultaneously hold ev constant

yeah, I was talking to my brother the other day and he said him and his buddy went down to the casino a year or so ago and his buddy went in the high rollers room and was betting quarters (min bet) and my brothr just sat, chilled and counted talking to the boss and dealer and jumping in when the count was optimal. He said they made $1750 in 3 days by hedging bets and positive progressions when the count/EV was favorable I think it was basically 500% at +4 or something to that effect. He exaggerates sometimes because he talks to women a lot and its kinda annoying. I'm gonna check up on that SD because that seems correct but factoring it as 200% when it's so close to the mean seems dangerous and quantitative progressions are better to take account of nawmean. When I get some time I'll go full autism and try to figure it out but I think you're on the right track, at least what you're saying is true

Progressions don't exist in ways to grow a bankroll, they are money losing strategies.. Please purge that concept from your gambling vocabulary.

I'm getting some programming book tomorrow in the mail that I'm going full autism on, should be obsessive.