Author Topic: Shake n Bake Recipie #100 - My Detailed Contribution by Li Part 1 of 2  (Read 46043 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ChronicBoom!

  • Adherent
  • *
  • Posts: 31
    • View Profile
Re: Shake n Bake Recipie #100 - My Detailed Contribution by Li Part 1 of 2
« Reply #75 on: December 01, 2014, 08:54:20 pm »
That's strange. Have seen some pretty decent shit come out of this method without cleaning first. Is this just imagination, or can it still be just thrown in the bottle?

Imo gup chucked with old feed stock will work. Gup chucked with feed stock from outside the US will work.

Crazy as it has seemed to work with some brands (or so I hear) straight outta the box.
Signature

Offline VenomStallone

  • Outlander
  • *
  • Posts: 18
  • BLTCC
    • View Profile
Re: Shake n Bake Recipie #100 - My Detailed Contribution by Li Part 1 of 2
« Reply #76 on: December 10, 2014, 12:24:38 am »
Ill spare myself a lot of time and explanation.

This tek WAS a good thing going. But Where im at now, it just took a shit. NOT WORKING! Produces product that has strange effects not noted before. Reaction not going chocolate milkshake color and staying. Instead it goes thick brown for a sec, then thick black/grey, almost like a clock reaction. Instead of clearing near the end, it goes cloudy with a tint of red/grey, and the noted "grey/white" layer that used to form on top of the nh3/naoh layer (which signaled true completion of bang as product) never forms. Product comes out fine, just isn't the same AT ALL. Its got a "tampered" with feel to it.

It may not be happened to anyone else yet, and if that  is the case, be prepared for a shit storm coming, because ITS HAPPENING HERE!

Calling all bees, some serious discussion needs to occur, NEED TO KNOW WHAT IS BEING PRODUCED AND WHY!

May Bee the beginning to a very evil Death By Gak twist. Lets get this shit figured out.

Offline sigilofbaphomet1567

  • Devotee
  • **
  • Posts: 110
    • View Profile
Re: Shake n Bake Recipie #100 - My Detailed Contribution by Li Part 1 of 2
« Reply #77 on: December 10, 2014, 12:29:44 am »
Ive had the same problem with this method, worded at first but changed. I think its result of a "secret"ingrediant theyre putting in the pseudo now as an anti abuse measure.. I read about it somewhere
Trust in me, in the peace.
Arnox's Boy<3

Offline VenomStallone

  • Outlander
  • *
  • Posts: 18
  • BLTCC
    • View Profile
Re: Shake n Bake Recipie #100 - My Detailed Contribution by Li Part 1 of 2
« Reply #78 on: December 10, 2014, 12:57:43 am »
Its no secret. Its called mislabeling the product and violating safety protocol standards. Sure clan chemistry in certain aspects may be a crime, but the irreversible effects of death is inhumane and goes beyond that. Not a good example to lead by.

Meth has had many negative effects on human life, but only seemingly outweighs the good, by using  commericial sandbagging tacts via the media. What about the good? Aids disappeared... people weren't sick.... people were happier. They were more productive. Heroin and cocaine wars died....

Either way, whatever is in these pills, might very well end up in everones food and water whenever the powers decide their solution to a compounded personal problem, has been tried and tested on the Target intended. But who cares right? The world goes on right?

In short/or long:

They can stop people from making meth,
they can make it hell for you to live,
But they will never be able to destroy something that they didn't create.

US

Offline sigilofbaphomet1567

  • Devotee
  • **
  • Posts: 110
    • View Profile
Re: Shake n Bake Recipie #100 - My Detailed Contribution by Li Part 1 of 2
« Reply #79 on: December 10, 2014, 12:59:31 am »
damn dude, I like the way you think, that's so fucking true
Trust in me, in the peace.
Arnox's Boy<3

Offline VenomStallone

  • Outlander
  • *
  • Posts: 18
  • BLTCC
    • View Profile
Re: Shake n Bake Recipie #100 - My Detailed Contribution by Li Part 1 of 2
« Reply #80 on: December 10, 2014, 12:59:32 am »
Oh and for the record

Crystal meth doesn't kill people, Death by Inactive Gaks Kills people!

Offline ChronicBoom!

  • Adherent
  • *
  • Posts: 31
    • View Profile
Re: Shake n Bake Recipie #100 - My Detailed Contribution by Li Part 1 of 2
« Reply #81 on: December 10, 2014, 03:09:47 am »
Ill spare myself a lot of time and explanation.

This tek WAS a good thing going. But Where im at now, it just took a shit. NOT WORKING! Produces product that has strange effects not noted before. Reaction not going chocolate milkshake color and staying. Instead it goes thick brown for a sec, then thick black/grey, almost like a clock reaction. Instead of clearing near the end, it goes cloudy with a tint of red/grey, and the noted "grey/white" layer that used to form on top of the nh3/naoh layer (which signaled true completion of bang as product) never forms. Product comes out fine, just isn't the same AT ALL. Its got a "tampered" with feel to it.

It may not be happened to anyone else yet, and if that  is the case, be prepared for a shit storm coming, because ITS HAPPENING HERE!

Calling all bees, some serious discussion needs to occur, NEED TO KNOW WHAT IS BEING PRODUCED AND WHY!

May Bee the beginning to a very evil Death By Gak twist. Lets get this shit figured out.

Noticed this for sure. It's got a strange feel like you mentioned and also the "shadow people" always seem to come for an early visit. It seems to cause some crazy hallucinations of things moving around a lot too. I was thinking it was too much lithium, but maybe not since I am not the only one.

---
Also seems to work out a bit differently with different brands. Seen some bomb ass stuff then next time crazy fucking hallucinations with it and weird feelings and so on and so forth
« Last Edit: December 10, 2014, 03:19:44 am by ChronicBoom! »
Signature

Offline DeJaVu

  • Adherent
  • *
  • Posts: 20
    • View Profile
Re: Shake n Bake Recipie #100 - My Detailed Contribution by Li Part 1 of 2
« Reply #82 on: December 10, 2014, 06:06:29 am »
I'd like to point out that the SnB was one of the biggest spankings the bad guys have ever received in their "war on drugs"... That tek progressed tenfold and traveled the globe because of DETAILED CONTRIBUTION BY MANY on the old site...

If such contribution, and detailed reports on theory and experience was resurrected in a forum such as this...the speed at which their feeble efforts would be squashed would be astounding...

Some bees have alwayz beelived that EVERYONE has something to contribute, and the collective knowledge and experience of ALL builds the TRUE strength of the colony...

Heed the call...contribute...and it could be like Dejavu...

If you do not wish to contribute, then you are a PUSSY FAGGOT, and you should know that I fuck your little sister up her little brownhole... I'm just sayin...

-Me
« Last Edit: December 10, 2014, 07:38:07 pm by DeJaVu »

Offline DeJaVu

  • Adherent
  • *
  • Posts: 20
    • View Profile
Re: Shake n Bake Recipie #100 - My Detailed Contribution by Li Part 1 of 2
« Reply #83 on: December 10, 2014, 07:11:07 pm »
Seeing that the notes that I found only referenced 2 recent reactions, and they were both done with generic wally red hots, I am interested in everyone's recent experience with different sources of feed stock...

Lets face it... If the write up that purp found on WD is accurate, it states that a certain pharm company created this Hell Gak as a deturant...but there are many different companies that produce the feed stock... Without intervention from the bad guys, I couldn't imagine that these various pharm companies go around sharing technologies...especially when it relates to unidentified, unlabled, secret ingredients that would be in direct violation of FDA regulations...

I'm not saying that the shit don't exist, I'm just saying that I would be very, VERY interested in reading some detailed reports about reactions run by SWIY with with different brands and variations of feed stock...

I know that the person that wrote the notes that I found wasn't intending to run any experiments in the foreseeable future, but I believe that this person is the type that will end up doing the research in the name of OUR cause, intellectual curiosity, and for all of those brothers and sisters that are REAL and paved the path of knowledge for him...

If you catz sincerely believe in your rights and freedoms, the best way you can excercise and retain them is to CONTRIBUTE to the cause that supports them... A collection of detailed ACCURATE reports from the collective can quickly and easily provide CONCLUSIVE answers to some important questions...

- Are ALL the common feed stocks showing these same tainted results?
- If not...which are and which are not?
- Are different geographical locations seeing different results from the feed stock?

Once these questions have been addressed conclusively. Bees can share experiences and results pertaining to pre reaction washes/extractions and post reaction workups...

I promise you, the last 2 batches that I read about were contaminated, but they WERE DOPE, and still better than some shit that has been purchased on the street over the years... I am not convinced that this shit can not be easily cleaned up before or after, but it takes much time for one....many minds and shared efforts and results are the only effective means to battle the bad guys.... If you will not contribute, then you deserve to snort/smoke/bang your Gaak poisons and I hope that it's a slow painful death...

If you care and want results...AND WANT TO WIN... Please CONTRIBUTE!!!

Offline ChronicBoom!

  • Adherent
  • *
  • Posts: 31
    • View Profile
Re: Shake n Bake Recipie #100 - My Detailed Contribution by Li Part 1 of 2
« Reply #84 on: December 11, 2014, 02:28:59 am »
Next time I hear of it, I shall be sure there are details of the reaction. Sounds very worth it to have them on record.
Signature

Offline DeJaVu

  • Adherent
  • *
  • Posts: 20
    • View Profile
Re: Shake n Bake Recipie #100 - My Detailed Contribution by Li Part 1 of 2
« Reply #85 on: December 11, 2014, 02:34:08 am »
Next time I hear of it, I shall be sure there are details of the reaction. Sounds very worth it to have them on record.

Right on Brother,  and the same goes for me...

Offline AlHarringtonCHN

  • Outlander
  • *
  • Posts: 16
    • View Profile
Re: Shake n Bake Recipie #100 - My Detailed Contribution by Li Part 1 of 2
« Reply #86 on: December 11, 2014, 06:08:03 pm »
1. There is no "secrect ingredient. "  They absolutely must list all ingrediants but could "hide" the actual chemical name. There could be massive lawsuits if said completely missing ingrediant caused ANY issue to consumers.

2. There are several Hell gakks. At the least Polysorbate 80 and caranuba wax both carry over with polar and nonpolar separations. The Gakks also interfere with the reaction between AN and NaOH.

3.  Some now include Castor Oil.

4. Everything still works with yields slightly reduced if adjustments are made. Proper ratios, adjusted timings, and diligent workup is crucial.

Offline AlHarringtonCHN

  • Outlander
  • *
  • Posts: 16
    • View Profile
Re: Shake n Bake Recipie #100 - My Detailed Contribution by Li Part 1 of 2
« Reply #87 on: December 11, 2014, 06:14:35 pm »
Ill spare myself a lot of time and explanation.

This tek WAS a good thing going. But Where im at now, it just took a shit. NOT WORKING! Produces product that has strange effects not noted before. Reaction not going chocolate milkshake color and staying. Instead it goes thick brown for a sec, then thick black/grey, almost like a clock reaction. Instead of clearing near the end, it goes cloudy with a tint of red/grey, and the noted "grey/white" layer that used to form on top of the nh3/naoh layer (which signaled true completion of bang as product) never forms. Product comes out fine, just isn't the same AT ALL. Its got a "tampered" with feel to it.

It may not be happened to anyone else yet, and if that  is the case, be prepared for a shit storm coming, because ITS HAPPENING HERE!

Calling all bees, some serious discussion needs to occur, NEED TO KNOW WHAT IS BEING PRODUCED AND WHY!

May Bee the beginning to a very evil Death By Gak twist. Lets get this shit figured out.

Noticed this for sure. It's got a strange feel like you mentioned and also the "shadow people" always seem to come for an early visit. It seems to cause some crazy hallucinations of things moving around a lot too. I was thinking it was too much lithium, but maybe not since I am not the only one.

---
Also seems to work out a bit differently with different brands. Seen some bomb ass stuff then next time crazy fucking hallucinations with it and weird feelings and so on and so forth


What method are you using for your extraction, H2O or HCl (g)?

2. How much Lithium are you using? More specific what are all your ratios? PSE/E, AN, NaOH, Li, NP and size of rv

Offline VenomStallone

  • Outlander
  • *
  • Posts: 18
  • BLTCC
    • View Profile
Re: Shake n Bake Recipie #100 - My Detailed Contribution by Li Part 1 of 2
« Reply #88 on: December 11, 2014, 06:36:24 pm »
Extraction: HCL gassing, after a water wash of fuel

1/4 cup AN
1/8 cup Naoh
2 li x9 strip

Rarely do i recharge, if i do it 1/8 an, and 1/16 naoh.

PSE 2.880g

NP is always 15 oz


Offline DeJaVu

  • Adherent
  • *
  • Posts: 20
    • View Profile
Re: Shake n Bake Recipie #100 - My Detailed Contribution by Li Part 1 of 2
« Reply #89 on: December 11, 2014, 08:38:15 pm »
Thank you for the info Al...

- 2.88g pse - wally world generic reds
- Wash crushed pill mass in non-polar for 6 hrs then decant and dry
- 3/8 cup NaOH
- 3/16 cup an (NaOH and an increased from 1/4 cup and 1/8 cup respectively to make rxn more violent... Dissolves Li quicker, and seems to make product more potent)
- Rarely recharge
- 2 AA Li strips
- 500ml reaction bottle
- Approx 300-350ml non-polar (ether or Hexane or both)
- Pse (pill mass) added when Li = approx 75% bronzed
- Multiple water washes
- Liquid-Liquid water/muriatic extraction

If any additional info Would help, please let me know...

Would you be willing to elaborate on "Proper ratios", "adjusted timings", and "diligent workups" please?

Thanks again for contributing brother.

-me