Not corrupt, just stupid. They just have that "new-school" gamer vibe to them that I can't stand. If you showed them pong they'd give it a 2/10 sorta shit. They do have a lot of good game reviews, but when it comes to the great ones like the original half life, or resident evil they just fall short of doing them justice and give other games, like the latest Mario or something, too much credit. I suppose I was over doing it a little by asking if you had downs for recommending them, but come on, who recommends gamespot?
Well, if you're just looking at scores, MAYBE I could see why you would think this. However, you should always read the full reviews. Now, if you want to see something stupid, IGN has that in freaking spades. Terrible reviews combined with some inaccurate journalism and their articles are written by idiots. Just recently, they did
an article on the Halo Collection coming out, saying that 343 most likely made it to see which game's multiplayer people would play the most. What?
You want to know what online multiplayer gamers will be playing? Halo: CE/Halo 2. You know why? For the simple fact that it's something new.
