god is math

[splooge gook]

anything that can be mathematically written or described as a law are the only constants in what would otherwise be chaos. a law is omnipotent to everything else in reality, and a law is resilient and unchanging (except in special circumstances), these laws modulating the chaos around them and creating what we are today, along with the rest of everything and everywhere

[splooge gook]

and sure there are many different perspectives to take on earth, but the only one that could every be objectively written or applicable would be mathematics. everything else undergoes constant decay. it may not seem that way because we're so weak we only live to like 75. in another thousand years we may just be a bombed out desert wasteland, the only thing will be relevant between now and then is how the physics of it all worked.

i wonder if things we consider mathematical laws can morph or distort in alternate universes and shit like that?

if that were the case, mathematicswouldn't be god, the core of the law would stay, while who knows how many variations are created on each law. or chaos. i'm psyching myself out abit a bit i think i need to lay down

[mashleshmash]

wat is this i don't even





sploo is ur mom hot

[Max Headroom]

OMG SPLORG U HIT 420 POSTS CONGRS MANNG

[Ninja]

Math is boring and lifeless.  It's all about the energy.

[Internet-Weed-Dude]

Yin and yang have different properties.  However they also unite together, complete each other and would not exist without each other.  Therefore they are one.

This is a reversal of an earlier claim, made by you, that different regions of space could not have different properties. No one has argued that things can't compose to have an emergent identity. It was you who would deny a tire is still a tire when it got bolted onto a car (because now "it is one" with the car). Do you reject the earlier claim or have you misstated your new position? If it's the former then great, you now have an ontological foundation for, well, basically anything and everything. If it's the latter then you still have an a totally batty position that's basically nihilism.

When we get right down to it you're just telling me I shouldn't do math because I see the world differently then you, but you're wrong.  It is not impossible to see the world in more than one way.

I never claimed you can only see the world one way. Some ways of seeing it (including yours) are wrong or so muddled as to not even qualify to have a truth value. You can, obviously, do mathematic if you want but it doesn't make sense to do it giving your other beliefs and it's internally inconsistent if you want to make dorky claims like "god is math".

Subtext;

"I'm more educated and intelligent than every person in this thread... Except for myself in which case it's a tie. Don't fuck with me or my assertions or I will verbally sodomize you and publicly."

Great to see you, Lanny. Long time.

[splooge gook]

anything that can be mathematically written or described as a law are the only constants in what would otherwise be chaos. a law is omnipotent to everything else in reality, and a law is resilient and unchanging (except in special circumstances), these laws modulating the chaos around them and creating what we are today, along with the rest of everything and everywhere

>nobody disputes a 17 y/os's argument for why math is god

well i guess laws can be mathematically written, written in english, in arbitray symbols. all of those things are representative of the laws, but can be described in different ways. so it would be more accurate to say logic is god, and any idea we create, graph out, describe,  and the new things we build are based on this logic which we can define all the way back to the creation of the big bang ("if there is no logic, anything can happen, so the big bang could just be coincidence from the absence of logic.).

would that leave us with randomness being the other half of our framework. some people think the universe is deterministic, but we also know there are constant leaps or alterations that are seemingly random in the quantum realm ,leaving us with two things to believe in

either that
 a. logic would be the most accurate metaphorical representation by the definition of god, and chaos would be the absence of logic (i.e. 0s and 1s)
b. logic and chaos are two seperate entities
(1 and ?)

[bling bling]

ur post have many flaws but is 100% i have been to the other sideee they took me down and BEAMMMED ME ABORD the craft as it hovered above my housing complex

[mojo4567]

ur post have many flaws but is 100% i have been to the other sideee they took me down and BEAMMMED ME ABORD the craft as it hovered above my housing complex

Did they probe you? Did it make you horny

[Lanny]

Subtext;

"I'm more educated and intelligent than every person in this thread... Except for myself in which case it's a tie. Don't fuck with me or my assertions or I will verbally sodomize you and publicly."

Now that just makes me sound like a jerk :p. I would hope that a well reasoned argument is accessible to a rational person at any level of education.

Great to see you, Lanny. Long time.

hai2u

[bling bling]

ur post have many flaws but is 100% i have been to the other sideee they took me down and BEAMMMED ME ABORD the craft as it hovered above my housing complex

Did they probe you? Did it make you horny

they took me 2 da institution and ran all kinds off testss