Since when were the FSA "moderate" rebels?

[unbreakable matter]

this is certainly news to them

[Cory]

Since ISIS and Al-Nusra made them look decent, basically.

[unbreakable matter]

The FSA have dirt on the US and Turkey, hence they're allowed to be called "moderate" to downplay their warcrimes and hardcore Sharia ideology. They're worse than Al Nusra actually. The FSA is more dangerous because they literally have child soldiers and indoctrinate non practicing muslims and moderates.

[Cory]

The FSA have dirt on the US and Turkey, hence they're allowed to be called "moderate" to downplay their warcrimes and hardcore Sharia ideology. They're worse than Al Nusra actually. The FSA is more dangerous because they literally have child soldiers and indoctrinate non practicing muslims and moderates.

Citation?

[unbreakable matter]

The FSA have dirt on the US and Turkey, hence they're allowed to be called "moderate" to downplay their warcrimes and hardcore Sharia ideology. They're worse than Al Nusra actually. The FSA is more dangerous because they literally have child soldiers and indoctrinate non practicing muslims and moderates.

Citation?

They wide openly admit to recruiting kids as young as 16 but most claim they have kids younger than that fighting for them. How the fuck are you not aware of this but pretending to know what you're talking about.

IQ?

[Cory]

They wide openly admit to recruiting kids as young as 16 but most claim they have kids younger than that fighting for them. How the fuck are you not aware of this but pretending to know what you're talking about.

Oh c'mon, having 16 year olds fighting in a Civil War isn't anything new. When you said "child soldiers" I thought you meant like straight-up kids.

[unbreakable matter]

Oh, ok because the UN defines it as anyone under 18 but I guess that doesn't matter because sudanese warlords have 14 year olds with AKs and just as much international monitoring as the chemical weapons dumping FSA.

You just literally tried to justify child soldiers

[Cory]

Oh, ok because the UN defines it as anyone under 18 but I guess that doesn't matter because sudanese warlords have 14 year olds with AKs and just as much international monitoring as the chemical weapons dumping FSA.

You just literally tried to justify child soldiers

Christ you're dense. Also this in no way makes them "worse then Al-Nusra".

[unbreakable matter]

Please tell me, how are they worse...because Al Nusra is affiliated with Al Queda? Good fucking goy you are. Al Nusra's provided aid to different rebel groups and citizens in aleppo. They definitely never used any chemical weapons like the FSA. Why do you ever pretend to know what you're talking about?

[unbreakable matter]

I wonder if Cory is implying the FSA have no links to Al Queda or terrorism. I wonder what his IQ would be should he do so

[Cory]

Please tell me, how are they worse...because Al Nusra is affiliated with Al Queda? Good fucking goy you are. Al Nusra's provided aid to different rebel groups and citizens in aleppo.

They are worse because they support a super conservative Islamic state in Syria. Them providing aid to citizens has literally nothing do do with the subject at hand.

For some time the FSA did have a large contingent of Islamists however (rather ironically) this has changed due to the rise of IS and Al-Nusra. The radicals have largely gone over to the more "pure" forces.

They definitely never used any chemical weapons like the FSA. Why do you ever pretend to know what you're talking about?

Citation. Fucking. Needed.

Do you just believe everything you read on conspiracy sites or something? Why do you ever pretend to know what you're talking about?

[Jedi Moped]

The FSA have dirt on the US and Turkey, hence they're allowed to be called "moderate" to downplay their warcrimes and hardcore Sharia ideology. They're worse than Al Nusra actually. The FSA is more dangerous because they literally have child soldiers and indoctrinate non practicing muslims and moderates.

Citation?

They wide openly admit to recruiting kids as young as 16 but most claim they have kids younger than that fighting for them. How the fuck are you not aware of this but pretending to know what you're talking about.

IQ?

Then it shouldn't be any trouble to provide a source for your statement.

[bling bling]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMjXbuj7BPI

[Infinityshock]

Oh, ok because the UN defines it as anyone under 18 but I guess that doesn't matter because sudanese warlords have 14 year olds with AKs and just as much international monitoring as the chemical weapons dumping FSA.

You just literally tried to justify child soldiers

the liberians used kids younger than that.  NGOs made estimates that children as young as 8 were active combatants.  there werent any official records so there was no way of verifying ages...they estimated based on physical appearance.