Y'all are missing the point. I'm not bitching about low resolutions, but rather the use of TV aspect ratios on laptops. These screens need to be tall, at minimum 900 vertical pixels to be usable for the kind of work I and other developers do. Massive horizontal resolutions do nothing but drain the battery and waste GPU rendering power.
My 1600x1200 20" LCD desktop monitor is awesome. I can fit over 100 lines of code on my screen. A 1366x768 laptop? Utterly useless, even for banging out a couple scripts while sitting in a hotel room on a business trip. Poor contrast, GUI apps and icons appear massive and take up most of the screen, no vertical real estate. These displays are designed for watching films and playing games.
Is it just me or are the only people who hate Macs for seemingly no reason too poor to have ever afforded one? What's wrong you hate top of the line hardware and superior build quality? Seriously?
EL OH FUCKING EL. I cleared $4K this month, but I have no interest in an overpriced hipster machine with mid-range, locked in hardware. For a similar price I can get a new Dell Latitude and have a vastly superior chassis, screen, and keyboard with the ability to add more RAM and a large SSD if I so desire. But whatever floats your boat, several of my colleagues own Macbook Pro models and they are certainly built more solidly than your average $500 consumer laptop. I don't hate them, but I largely blame Apple for starting the idiotic glossy screen trend some 8 years ago.
(Typical Mac fanboy ignores the OP in order to respond to a tangential comment poking fun at his precious Apple products)
What's wrong with Macbook keyboards?
Island style keys with poor spacing and inadequate tactile feedback.