Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - ricomock

Pages: [1] 2 3
1
Weapons & Combat / Re: How Can We Combat Modern Military Equipment/Weapons?
« on: November 06, 2014, 05:30:13 am »
Indeed. I brought up that same point in an earlier thread as well. But one mustn't assume things will go well at all. It's best to plan for the worst case scenario for obvious reasons. We should assume that manpower will be few in number. Now, with a fully-featured 3D printer, I definitely think ones options would open up a lot more. With such, all one would need are some plans to put into the computer and all the materials and boom. Full access to any technology we can salvage.

3d-printing is more or less irrelevant for weapons, much less weapons for war or sustained use. The only non-single-shot firearm I've seen printed was a 1911 printed out of a metal powder scintering 'printer', which took several months and cost upwards of $6k. for precision manufacture, you'd need a decent C&C machine and a good knowledge of how to use it. in desperate times, take a page out of the Chechens' book - you can make a gun out of pretty much anything, as long as you can get bullets. corner one of them in his room and he'll make a submachinegun out of the bedframe.

specific to the US though, I have no idea if that'd help in a suppression/martial law situation. police offices get ex-military equipment close to free when the military hits surplus or equipment no longer meets their requirements. I read about a university in San Francisco that bought their campus security team a humvee with anti-IED measures because they could get it for like 2k, and police departments buying up rocket launchers and other heavy weapons.

some people believe that it's a planned method to work around habeas corpus; arming the police with military equipment so that the military don't need to be deployed against the domestic populace, but in reality it's more just a result of extremely irresponsible and excessive defense contracting. I doubt that police would be able to enact large-scale (see: nationwide) suppression operations even in they wanted to, and I suspect that without the conditioning and training the military are subject to, many would simply turn in their uniforms if the alphabet agencies told them to use widespread lethal force.

I'll come back later if this thread is still going; I wanted to write something about the trend of modern weapons trying to reduce accountability and distance the user from actual murder (see: drone operators), but ldap is giving me cancer

 :o

CNC.....computer numerical control

2
Weapons & Combat / Re: How Can We Combat Modern Military Equipment/Weapons?
« on: November 06, 2014, 05:25:17 am »

Those LRAD's are highly overrated. Their big weakness is that they obviously only work in the direction they're pointed in. And all it takes is a well-placed missile right into that sensitive dish to mess it all up. Heck, not even that perhaps. Maybe a simple high caliber rifle of some sort will take care of it. Might need a couple AP rounds but I'm sure one could get the job done.

As to people, yes, I'm sure there will be some violent people but Ferguson has taught us that the sensible people outnumber those who will attack others to get what they want. Not only that, they're disorganized and as such, are easily rounded up. A few lone people against a coordinated group of three will be hard pressed to resist such to say the least.

And c'mon now. Look at ALL the prison riots in history. People up against heavily armed guards with nothing but a darn shiv. Do not underestimate people.

You talk about "firing a missile" and acquiring RPGs with such nonchalance, but in the real world getting your hands on such weaponry is very difficult for anyone not in the military or part of a government entity. And I guess we'll have to disagree on the abilities of an LRAD, but try to remember usually what the government tells us about whatever technologies potential is just the tip of the iceberg as they aren't giving away all their secrets.

In regard to bringing up Ferguson, I'm not sure why you brought that up.....because you just proved my point perfectly. You had a "united populace".....with a sense of one common goal outraged at a social injustice. And despite all of their numbers, exactly what happened? Order was restored by the military and police, not because they had the numbers.....but because they had the weaponry, technology and the system quelling the "cause".

Opportunistic rioters aren't really dedicated to their "cause", and lack any form of discipline.....

 


The events at the Bundy Ranch are a much better example of armed Americans taking a stand, than anything that's happened in Furgadishu

3
Weapons & Combat / Re: How Can We Combat Modern Military Equipment/Weapons?
« on: November 06, 2014, 05:15:45 am »
look at Vietnam. technologically speaking, that should have been a flat out slaughter...but it wasn't.

Wow. I can't believe I forgot about that. Yeah, this though.

It is very hard to argue that the US has won a ground war since WW2.

Unless our military is willing to start going things how the Izzy's do them, Rifle's, ammo, men, and money are all that is needed

4
Weapons & Combat / Re: Is Gunbroker.com a Good Way to Get Some Firearms?
« on: November 04, 2014, 07:12:18 am »
So again its not legal but it is possible.

Just like buying drugs

There is not loophole that allows people to do it, they just break the law to do it

5
Weapons & Combat / Re: The Official M1911 Thread
« on: October 29, 2014, 09:54:36 pm »
Shoot one before you buy. If you're used to modern designs you may be disappointed by the 1911 platform. They're beautiful pistols, but are mediocre pistols by today's standards

6
Unless you practice with it, and are good at keeping your wits when scared and just woken up, you're probably more likely to hurt yourself. I have a 12 gauge I mainly use for hunting, but since I have it anyway, I keep it prepped for home defense. To me, that means it's loaded with rock salt. It will wreck someone's day, but in a way that everyone will recover from, eventually.

Loading your 12 gauge with rock salt is a really fucking stupid idea.  If you ever have to use it on somebody, they will sue your ass off.  Thanks to leftist retards in the judicial system, the burglar will own your ass.
Bullshit.  If George Zimmerman can stalk a kid then chase him down and shoot him to death and WALK then I can't believe anyone would be charged for defending themselves from an intruder in their own home.

This seems like an urban legend to me made up by right wing paranoid douches who think the "lefties" are out to get them n take their guns.

1. Going to where he saw someone acting like a dip shit, making a phone call, and heading back to his vehicle is not stalking
2. The nigger is the one who chased Zimmerman down, as Zimmerman was leaving


3. No, it's not even a urban legend. He's just making the being sued thing up. But he is correct that rock salt should not be used for home defense, it has vertically zero chance of reaching vital organs 

7
I'd rather get sued than kill someone that didn't necessarily need killing. And that shit doesn't happen nearly as often as you think it does (which isn't to say it doesn't happen).

If they're breaking into your home they need killing

8
Cheek weld.......How does it work?

9






Why do I get the feeling that going to a bar is a more effective way to learn to fight than anything you're going to post?

10
NIMF / Re: Lets ban all racists
« on: October 09, 2014, 11:59:49 pm »
Denying that there are sociological and statistical bases for racism is just ignorant.




11
Weapons & Combat / Re: Wikihow to clear a building w a firearm
« on: October 03, 2014, 12:14:30 am »
Why would this ever be useful information?

Y'all watch too many action films lol.

Hope no one robs your ass.... oh wait yes I do.

Surprisingly this is one of only a very few decent tutorials I have seen about navigating a building with armed intruders

12
News of the World / Re: Sperm bank gives out wrong sample- Hilarious
« on: October 02, 2014, 06:53:48 pm »
Wow, that's really a shame.  Hope the girl doesn't grow up thinking one of her moms hates her or something :/

They don't "hate" her, they just want a refund on her because the racist femnazis wanted a white baby

13
Weapons & Combat / Re: California governor signs gun-seizure law
« on: October 02, 2014, 03:18:59 am »
I've had family members shoot themselves following periods of obvious emotional instability.  You can say what you will about rights and personal freedoms, but this really could save lives.

Yeah, if they can't get ahold of a gun, there is absolutely 0% chance that they will use a knife or exit bag instead.

Those means are less lethal, and people are less likely to go through with them as it gives them more time to consider what they're doing.  The exit bag especially takes a great deal of premeditation, but even if you've sliced your carotid artery open chances are you will survive if you decide to apply pressure and call 911.

Look at the stats in australia after they banned guns. Suicide via gun went down. Suicide via hanging went up commensurately

out of curiosity...where does one apply pressure to stop a severed carotid artery...

[img]http://www.acc.af.mil/shared/media/photodb/web/2014/01/140113-F-ZT243-320.jpg[/img]


Are image tags off limits now because of the CP that kept being posted?

U dont have 20 posts. When u do, you can

Yea...thatll work

A severed carotid artery = death unless the person is sitting and prepped in a surgical suite

Apparently that attempt at sarcasm was a complete failure

14
Weapons & Combat / Re: California governor signs gun-seizure law
« on: October 02, 2014, 12:40:48 am »
I've had family members shoot themselves following periods of obvious emotional instability.  You can say what you will about rights and personal freedoms, but this really could save lives.

Yeah, if they can't get ahold of a gun, there is absolutely 0% chance that they will use a knife or exit bag instead.

Those means are less lethal, and people are less likely to go through with them as it gives them more time to consider what they're doing.  The exit bag especially takes a great deal of premeditation, but even if you've sliced your carotid artery open chances are you will survive if you decide to apply pressure and call 911.

Look at the stats in australia after they banned guns. Suicide via gun went down. Suicide via hanging went up commensurately

out of curiosity...where does one apply pressure to stop a severed carotid artery...

[img]http://www.acc.af.mil/shared/media/photodb/web/2014/01/140113-F-ZT243-320.jpg[/img]


Are image tags off limits now because of the CP that kept being posted?

15
Weapons & Combat / Re: California governor signs gun-seizure law
« on: October 02, 2014, 12:35:06 am »
I've had family members shoot themselves following periods of obvious emotional instability.  You can say what you will about rights and personal freedoms, but this really could save lives.


It also contradicts several constitutional amendments, and will be abused often

Pages: [1] 2 3